<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>jack</title>
  <link>https://jack.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>jack - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:47:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>jack</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://jack.dreamwidth.org/797807.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:47:43 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Connotations of &quot;privilege&quot;</title>
  <link>https://jack.dreamwidth.org/797807.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;What are the connotations of the traditional English word &quot;privilege&quot;? I think I would say:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It&apos;s unfair that someone has X when other people don&apos;t.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A minority of people have X&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;By default, but not necessarily, X is something that people have that they shouldn&apos;t be entitled to&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You might quibble with the details, but I think that&apos;s &lt;i&gt;roughly&lt;/i&gt; what people would expect, even though, as with just about every other word in the history of language, it&apos;s used in varying ways.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How do they match up to the related-but-different modern usage of male privilege, white privilege, etc?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think (1) is the big one, and why the term was coined at all, that it refers to things that men get from society by default and women don&apos;t and that that IS unfair, and the word was chosen to emphasise that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, I think a lot of the confusion is because (2) and (3) &lt;em&gt;don&apos;t&lt;/em&gt; really apply. &quot;privilege&quot; is naturally used equally much for groups which are a minority (rich privilege), about equal numbers (male privilege), or a majority (non-disabled privilege). And it&apos;s used much more often for things that other people &lt;i&gt;want&lt;/i&gt; to be able to do (eg. the privilege of walking down the street without expecting catcalls) rather than things they wish no-one could do (eg. the &quot;privilege&quot; of being able to catcall people walking down the street).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, it may be the case, that the name correctly captures the aspect of &quot;unfair&quot;, but by bad luck also sounds like it means &quot;you shouldn&apos;t have that&quot;, when most people using it probably actually mean &quot;everyone should have that&quot;. As Moses says, he&apos;s not jealous of other people being prophets -- he wishes &lt;i&gt;everyone&lt;/i&gt; could be prophets, he just happens to be lucky that he&apos;s achieved it first when many other people haven&apos;t.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m not saying we should avoid the word[1], but if I have a moment of negative reaction I think it&apos;s useful to recognise &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; we do. Since if I understand &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; I feel like I&apos;m being blamed or threatened, even if that&apos;s not the intention, it may be easier to separate those feelings. And hence actually listen to what&apos;s being said, rather than reacting with a general blanket of resistance and negativity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h4&gt;Footnote [1]&lt;/h4&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At least, without a positive suggestion for another term which would suggest &quot;unfair&quot; equally well, but with more accurate connotations for &quot;everyone should have it&quot;. I doubt it, but is there word that might be better but equally understandable?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As always with discussions about this sort of topic, I find it very very difficult to say that &quot;people who are drawing attention to an injustice don&apos;t have an obligation to keep trying until they find language that the person with the problem is comfortable with&quot; while also saying &quot;but it needn&apos;t be completely and utterly verboten in every conceivable OTHER circumstance to discuss which terminology is most actually useful at being understood&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(And even if it&apos;s the best term we have, I don&apos;t think it&apos;s necessary to pretend that the unintended connotations &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; cause problems, even amongst people familiar with the terminology.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=jack&amp;ditemid=797807&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://jack.dreamwidth.org/797807.html</comments>
  <category>privilege</category>
  <category>society</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>15</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
