<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>jack</title>
  <link>https://jack.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>jack - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:23:32 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>jack</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://jack.dreamwidth.org/787052.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:23:32 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>National Rail</title>
  <link>https://jack.dreamwidth.org/787052.html</link>
  <description>However, every time I go anyway, I am still horrendously annoyed by buying train tickets. I normally need an off-peak return.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This time I was confused because I tried to find out which trains back from London to Cambridge on Monday my off-peak ticket was valid for, but when I looked up journeys on the website &lt;i&gt;none&lt;/i&gt; of the King&apos;s Cross trains were listed as offering an off-peak ticket.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I felt it was most likely that my ticket would work as normal, before whatever the rush-hour cut-off was. But I couldn&apos;t quite dismiss the nagging doubt that they &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; have found some loophole and changed the rules so the fast train was &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; off-peak -- that seemed ludicrous, but not the most ludicrous rules change I&apos;d seen.[1]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, it ended happily, as I decided to just go to King&apos;s Cross and try, and I arrived just as a fast Cambridge train was announced, and ran to the platform and got on with about thirty seconds to spare.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Looking at the national rail website now I&apos;m back to a real web browser, it seems my mistake was to look at single fares. There are separate &quot;slightly more off-peak tickets&quot; only valid on Liverpool Street routes, just to make sure to gouge anyone who stupidly buys a ticket before comparing possible different tickets from different train operators, and those do have separate single and return off-peak tickets. So I hadn&apos;t realised that the suggested single ticket from King&apos;s Cross was &quot;anytime&quot; because the only possible &quot;off-peak&quot; ticket was a day return which cost more than a single anytime.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I should have figured that out if I looked at possible alternative tickets, but my mind stupidly got stuck on the idea that I could look at the website to figure out which trains my off-peak return were valid for, and I didn&apos;t consider the alternatives.[2]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And that doesn&apos;t even touch on the rules for when a rail ticket &quot;to London Terminals&quot; is valid on a tube ride (it seems &quot;often, but never quite on the one you want to take&quot;).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[1] I assumed &quot;peak&quot; meant &quot;peak travel times&quot;, but a friend insisted it meant &quot;peak prices&quot;, and if it did, &quot;off-peak&quot; would technically be a valid description even if the ticket was only valid on second tuesdays...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[2] I do think it&apos;s somewhat deceptive to sell someone a ticket which is supposedly valid on different trains, whilst deliberately obscuring which trains it IS valid on. And yes, I realise if I scrupulously want to travel at a particular time, however expensive or inconvenient, the rail planner works, but that&apos;s not automatically the case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=jack&amp;ditemid=787052&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://jack.dreamwidth.org/787052.html</comments>
  <category>rant</category>
  <category>rail</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>8</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
