Moral debate
Nov. 15th, 2005 03:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
jackHmm, there seems to be too much debate today. ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
gerald_duck, robert_jones, filecoreinuse. And even extended argument about grammar and ice-cream with feanelwa and ewx not-respectively[1].
I guess I'm putting something off :)
In other news: I expected everyone to criticise my phases of the moon, but they didn't. I can never predict what will set people off ;)
[1] Would you distinguish "non-respectively" meaning "not necessarily in the order listed" and "not-respectively" meaning "not in the order listed?" Why didn't I just change the order? Because then I couldn't have this amusing footnote :)
gerald_duck, robert_jones, filecoreinuse. And even extended argument about grammar and ice-cream with feanelwa and ewx not-respectively[1].I guess I'm putting something off :)
In other news: I expected everyone to criticise my phases of the moon, but they didn't. I can never predict what will set people off ;)
[1] Would you distinguish "non-respectively" meaning "not necessarily in the order listed" and "not-respectively" meaning "not in the order listed?" Why didn't I just change the order? Because then I couldn't have this amusing footnote :)