Spin-off discussion #1: Actual taboos
Jul. 6th, 2013 10:17 amhttp://cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com/846610.html
I notice I listed taboos like "don't support mandatory cycle helmets" not "don't be racist", even though the latter is hopefully more verboten, and I'm not quite sure why.
I think things on the boundary of acceptability get more attention, because they come up more often, and people feel insecure about them. So cycle helmets are likely to start a big discussion, but racism may just get a "don't say that". (Or unfortunately, possibly, many people may be too tired to continue the debate, assuming anyone who hasn't got it yet, won't ever get it.)
But I'm not sure why? Is it because I took anti-racism, anti-sexism, etc to be so obvious that people who disagree are just wrong, rather than breaking a taboo? But that's not right -- it clearly is a taboo, it's just that I can't imagine holding a belief extreme enough to break it, even though I'm sure most of used to at some point in our lives.
Or is it that everyone agrees racism is a lot worse, but there's more people for whom cycle helmets personally affect them, so there's more emotion? I don't think so, but I'm not sure.
Is there a difference between the two groups? Is there any reason the less-wrong ones felt more like a taboo than the more-wrong ones?
I notice I listed taboos like "don't support mandatory cycle helmets" not "don't be racist", even though the latter is hopefully more verboten, and I'm not quite sure why.
I think things on the boundary of acceptability get more attention, because they come up more often, and people feel insecure about them. So cycle helmets are likely to start a big discussion, but racism may just get a "don't say that". (Or unfortunately, possibly, many people may be too tired to continue the debate, assuming anyone who hasn't got it yet, won't ever get it.)
But I'm not sure why? Is it because I took anti-racism, anti-sexism, etc to be so obvious that people who disagree are just wrong, rather than breaking a taboo? But that's not right -- it clearly is a taboo, it's just that I can't imagine holding a belief extreme enough to break it, even though I'm sure most of used to at some point in our lives.
Or is it that everyone agrees racism is a lot worse, but there's more people for whom cycle helmets personally affect them, so there's more emotion? I don't think so, but I'm not sure.
Is there a difference between the two groups? Is there any reason the less-wrong ones felt more like a taboo than the more-wrong ones?