![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
jackThe concept of FAQ has grown too large. How do you distinguish between a FAQ for: "What is this damn thing anyway?" and "OK, I've got it. What do I do now?"; and a FAQ for "Hey, wouldn't it be cool if [it did this implausible idea]" and "I was wondering. You write software. Will you go on a date with me?"?
I think the second is more *really* a FAQ, as in a section which wouldn't have a name if FAQ didn't exist. The first could be called a tutorial, or introduction, or manual. But the FAQ has made the first it's own, in a useful way. Should they have different names?
(Of course, some people extrapolate this trend to questions that *ought* to be asked, or they wish they would ask. But that's still morally the user guide. They're generally funny too.)
I think the second is more *really* a FAQ, as in a section which wouldn't have a name if FAQ didn't exist. The first could be called a tutorial, or introduction, or manual. But the FAQ has made the first it's own, in a useful way. Should they have different names?
(Of course, some people extrapolate this trend to questions that *ought* to be asked, or they wish they would ask. But that's still morally the user guide. They're generally funny too.)