(no subject)
Jun. 4th, 2007 03:13 pmDo you like reading your own writing?
My LJ or newsgroup comments always seem a bit pointless. My diary LJ entries show fairly well what I was doing at the time. Emails I sent generally turn out to be nice enough, but I was never as polite as I thought I was in official emails, and in social chatty emails the contact was nice but the content not as urgent as we thought at the time :)
In essays I generally find I may have been interesting, but wasn't putting over a thought as coherently as I might, more writing a connected series of things.
But in fiction or witterings of any sort, I always find myself much more entertained than anyone else ever seemed, as if I were narcissisticly my own favourite author.
See this post about a dangerous stellar radiation source. No-one else commented at all, but *I* thought I brought it off very well :)
My LJ or newsgroup comments always seem a bit pointless. My diary LJ entries show fairly well what I was doing at the time. Emails I sent generally turn out to be nice enough, but I was never as polite as I thought I was in official emails, and in social chatty emails the contact was nice but the content not as urgent as we thought at the time :)
In essays I generally find I may have been interesting, but wasn't putting over a thought as coherently as I might, more writing a connected series of things.
But in fiction or witterings of any sort, I always find myself much more entertained than anyone else ever seemed, as if I were narcissisticly my own favourite author.
See this post about a dangerous stellar radiation source. No-one else commented at all, but *I* thought I brought it off very well :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 03:31 pm (UTC)In the same way, I have a suspicion that most of my LJ icons entertain me far more than anyone else.
One or two of the things you have written I *really* liked (and have commented on at the time) ... but I don't know if they're the ones you specially like or not.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 03:47 pm (UTC)Like, in the real world, I can appreciate better cakes than I can bake :)
One or two of the things you have written I *really* liked (and have commented on at the time)
Ooh, thank you. Though now I'm curious, can you remember which :)
I'd expect some difference in my favorites to other people's. Many creators have commented that their favorites aren't everyone else's. But sometimes I seem to be the only one who appreciates something at all, and sometimes the only one who doesn't :) I can imagine it being incredibly frustrating if (a little like Tolkien and LOTR) everyone praises you for something you don't think is that great...
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 03:54 pm (UTC)I did a splendid painting out of the hobbit for my first year art exam (we were read a passage from the hobbit and then told to paint something inspired by it). Well, I was dead pleased with it. I got 38% and came bottom of the class.
last year when I was writing my nine-month report I had terrible trouble getting it to be how I wanted - I knew what was good when I saw it/managed to write it, but I couldn't see how to /get/ it, so it was a bit hit and miss.
was there something like 'how the kitten became', and a similar one about fire?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 03:57 pm (UTC)Amusingly I was reading an old discussion on toothywiki once, and was about to add my opinion when I realised the next person had beautifully, clearly and wryly made exactly the points I was about to make. Gosh, thought I, only to be even more amazed to get to the end and find out it was written by me a year or two previously.
So yes, I love my own writing even when I don't know it is my writing.
That's not to say your writing isn't good though!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 04:15 pm (UTC)was there something like 'how the kitten became', and a similar one about fire?
Oh yes, thank you! Sorry, I thought you were talking about old blog posts.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 04:34 pm (UTC)I generally think in pictures; I just use words as an intermediary for getting the picture from my head to someone else's.
When I try and draw the pictures that are in my head, they tend not really to be drawable. Maybe my imaginarypictures<-> pictures is like the RL-Escher mapping. Or maybe I just can't draw after all :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 05:19 pm (UTC)The advantage of reading back later is that over time it disinclines one from huge melodrama posts, which are embarrassing to read back. (It doesn't entirely prevent these, for what is the use of a diary which doesn't try to capture just a little of the passion of the moment?). It's also slightly revealing - it scares me how certain themes (particularly money) recur in my LJ with what seems to me disproportionate frequency.
So no, I don't think you're being overly narcissistic at all, though people who don't understand the whole blog/ diary thing are entitled to their own opinions.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 11:28 pm (UTC)Anything recurring often is a good hint :)
Enjoying it is good, if you can manage it. And it's helped IMMENSELY to place dates, of course.
(I didn't really feel *very* narcissistic, but had to self-efface a little, or I'd just be posting "mwahaha" :))
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 07:37 am (UTC)