But I understand where they're coming from. It's kind of about being critical enough to question popular 'facts' - it's just a shame that sometimes that comes across as saying, "No, it's *this* 'fact' instead."
Yes, well put! *hug* That, exactly.
(BTW, is the "0" a typo, or something I don't understand?)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-10 12:48 am (UTC)Yes, well put! *hug* That, exactly.
(BTW, is the "0" a typo, or something I don't understand?)