Oh, hm. I implicitly assumed that would only catch things which were deliberately ambiguous, in a misleading way. Not that it would force you to answer, and prevent you not answering. But I don't know how much of that was in the story and how much was my expectation.
Now I look, it seems that they only described the urge to respond when you said something like "this sentence is false", I don't know if that covers usual equivocation or not: I guess maybe usual equivocation would produce mild dampness, if it was true but you deliberately left out the important information...
no subject
Date: 2014-07-11 03:52 pm (UTC)Now I look, it seems that they only described the urge to respond when you said something like "this sentence is false", I don't know if that covers usual equivocation or not: I guess maybe usual equivocation would produce mild dampness, if it was true but you deliberately left out the important information...