jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
Dumbledore and allies spend a chapter debating whether it was Harry or Voldemort who broke Bellatrix out of Azkaban. None suggest the true answer: it was both of them working together.

I can't believe it worked as an effective reveal that Quirrel was Voldemort. I mean, it was one of the top theories in fan forums, but look at the evidence: in the book, Quirrel was Voldemort, which I find probably most persuasive; Quirrel is openly evil; Harry gets the same sense of doom when he touches him as in the books; Quirrel especially loves Avada Kedavra; Quirrel is obsessed with immortality. But somehow, HPMOR managed to obscure the issue enough it wasn't a foregone conclusion.

In retrospect, I had two reasons for doubting: Quirrel was more intelligent and methodical than Voldemort ever seemed; and I liked Quirrel and I wanted to hope that someone cold could still do good things. And I think the second is true of some people, but I should have accepted I could be wrong about Q even when I didn't want to be. And the first, even though it didn't make sense before I knew V was a role played by Q (or both were roles played), I should have said, even if it doesn't make sense, how likely is it that there might be a good reason I haven't thought of? Actually quite likely.

It's always interesting what's the same as the original. EY basically does double down on "the power H has that V knows not is love" and makes it work. D turns out in the end to basically be the same: eccentric but well meaning, naturally good but beaten down by the war with V.

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org