Ah, I'm not sure. I'm totally happy with a bit of artistic license, but as I recall, one of them in the cell later calls it out, says it must be a set-up because they wouldn't put five cons on together, rather, one with four other guys. But now I'm not certain.
killing everybody, or correctly identifying the people you want dead in the dark then shooting them without revealing your identity to the survivors?
Uh, yes, that was rather my point. Although come to think of it, a big advantage of "kill everyone" is that you don't have any survivors asking where their pay is (especially if you fabricated the existence of a bunch of drugs, as he claims in his story).
no subject
Date: 2016-05-04 04:27 pm (UTC)killing everybody, or correctly identifying the people you want dead in the dark then shooting them without revealing your identity to the survivors?
Uh, yes, that was rather my point. Although come to think of it, a big advantage of "kill everyone" is that you don't have any survivors asking where their pay is (especially if you fabricated the existence of a bunch of drugs, as he claims in his story).