May. 13th, 2005

jack: (Default)
I am mainly amused to see that 'higher' means 'strictly higher'. Though I also wonder, if this test ranks me '100% expert' what rank people who use punctuation would be awarded[1]!

English Genius
You scored 100% Beginner, 100% Intermediate, 100% Advanced, and 100% Expert!
You did so extremely well, even I can't find a word to describe your excellence! You have the uncommon intelligence necessary to understand things that most people don't. You
have an extensive vocabulary, and you're not afraid to use it properly! Way to go!

Thank you so much for taking my test. I hope you enjoyed it!

For the complete Answer Key, visit my blog: http://shortredhead78.blogspot.com/.
Read more... )
jack: (Default)
1. Etymology and entomology

I like this one. It's funny.

2. Ignorance, stupidity and apathy

Q. What's the difference between ignorance and apathy?
A. The sadist says 'no'. No, wait, wrong joke. I don't know and I don't care.

3. Apathy, anthology, anthropology, archaeology, Indiana Jones, and paleontology

You'd think this would be easy. Even if you ignore the first two.

4. WWW and HTTP and HTML, and 'web', 'teh infobahn thingy' and 'the internet'

Yeah, ok, not disjoint, but still distinct. Though while we're on the subject, why do some websites still require you to prefix, or not prefix foo.com with www? If the place is too small or too large for 'www.foo.com' to refer to a single computer, is it that useful?

5. Ie and eg

I don't want to get into just spelling mistakes, though I used to be baffled by this one. You don't need to know the latin to remember what a two letter word means. Is it because they're short? No-one I've let live has ever written 'me' or 'aa' when they mean 'ie'.

But in fact, people confuse even the long hand versions. Often the best way to convey a definition *is* with an example, and if you just want to check someone can use the word it's great, but you need to be aware that it's not quite a definition because you're relying on the listener to fill in the blanks. I remember at school I was generally last when asked to define a word, because I kept trying to define them, rather than yelling "It's like when someone says 'foo'".

6. Maths and arithmetic.

7. =, ==, =~, eq, ~, ≡, ≈

I need to write a test "what sort of comparator are you." Though it's worth noticing that sometimes these *are* the same, at which point you get some fun maths.

. 99 to 1 and one in ninety-nine.

9. Atheist, agnostic, skeptic, luddite and heathen

I once had someone quite seriously correct me by saying atheists don't believe in souls or an afterlife. Now, fair enough, all the atheists *I* know are athiests because they're skeptics and as yet unconvinced by the evidence for God, but there's plenty of people who don't believe in a god for whatever reason, but do believe in things *I* would think are supernatural and/or stupid.

This one hadn't occurred to me until I saw the disclaimers on some skeptic websites, but they felt it necessary to say that skeptic didn't mean 'reject everything new' but 'hold in abeyance anything without supporting evidence'.

Atheist and agnostic is a tricky one, because it depends on your definitions, especially once you get into 'strong' and 'weak'. The one thing everyone but me seems to agree on is that these terms are well defined, but not *how* they're defined[1].

10. Nine and ten.

[1] NB: There's a lot to be said for using the original meaning, the logical entomologic[2] meaning, or the commonest meaning, but when you can't just look the answer up in a dictionary it can be helpful to qualify your speech. Though I suppose that means I can't use 'literal' now because no-one knows what it means.
[2] Deliberate joke.
jack: (Default)
1. St Ives

As I was going to Saint Ives,
I met a man with seven wives
Each wife had seven sacks,
Each sack had seven cats,
Each cat had seven kits
Kits, cats, sacks and wives
How many were going to Saint Ives?

Which way was the man going? Let's say 'from saint Ives', because that's traditional, ignoring the fact that I've certainly met people going the same way I'm going before, and that he might have been going to the *other* st ives.

Did he have his wives with him? Normally 'a man with seven wives' means he married them, not that they're there, but again tradition dictates they were with him. The version I saw cleverly bypassed these two by showing a picture, which clearly showed the man driving in the opposite direction with a cat-laden wagon.

So the tradtional answer is 'One. You.' But it seems obvious to me that the last two lines are asking 'how many kits, cats, sacks and wives', to which the answer would be 'none' making the same assumptions[1].

And finally, for the record, there are 7^4+7^3+7^2+7^1+7^0 mammals in his car.

[1] Yeah, there may be *other* cats going to saint ives, but that's not what it says.

2. Goats

"Three doors. One car. Two goats. You want the car. You choose a door. Monty Haul opens another door he knows to have a goat behind, and allows you to open your door, or the other one."

Switch, giving you a 2/3 chance: WLOG suppose the order is CGG, and you chose door n. If n is 1, you lose by switching (whether M opens 2 or 3), and if n is 2 or 3, you lose by not switching (M has opened the other one), giving switching a 2/3 chance of winning.

However, a large (though by no means largest) part of the confusion is that lots of people phrase the question differently. If Monty opens a door *he knows to have a goat*, the calculation works as described. If he opens a door at random, which *happens* to have a goat, then the normal analysis of "it doesn't matter, it's 1/3 either way, I mean 1/2" is correct, the other 1/3 being the one that didn't happen, him opening the car door and going 'whoops'.

What's worst is when the question says "he opens a door which has a goat behind" when it could be either interpretation, and you face the 'random but not uniform' problem which means it's basically unsolvable. In this case you could arbitrarily decide he opened a door at random, but that would fail miserably for indeterminates like "he put an integer amount of money in an envelope."

3. Yolks

"Is it more correct to say 'the yolk of an egg is white' or 'the yolk of an egg are white'?"

It's *more* correct to say 'is white' because that's grammatically correct and factually false, and the other is wrong both ways. If the question was "Is it correct to say..."[2] the answer would be 'mu'. Of course, in casual conversation the answer is "is yellow", but for a puzzle you should answer the question asked, shouldn't you?

[2] I've always heard 'more correct', I don't know what everyone else has...
jack: (Default)
It's better as a cartoon: http://arloandjanis.com/discussion1.htm but transcribed below for people who don't like links. Click the cartoon, rinse, and repeat to view the set.

W: If you really loved me---
M: Whoa! Stop right there. You always say that. "If I really loved you" I'd do this or that. Which, of course, I haven't. Is that actually what you think? That I don't love you?
W: Well, no...
M: Aha! My point!
jack: (Default)
Due to the combined magic of sunday night digital TV and saturday night latin dancing, I will watch Dr Who (and possibly Dr Who Confidential) on Sunday (*not* sat), at 7.00, and since several people have got into the habit of joining me, I'm spamming my flist to tell everyone that. Join me if you want :)

Active Recent Entries