Belief in God as an emotion
May. 31st, 2012 01:03 pmHumans have many emotions (or drives, or something else) which look like they're providing information, but actually aren't. Sometimes these are just an abberation, a glitch in something different. Eg. periodically someone wakes up in the middle of the night experiencing (i) paralysis, (ii) dread (iii) a sense of someone leaning over them.
As far as I know, this isn't for anything, it's just an failure of a failsafe that turned cf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_paralysis on while the mind was still partially awake. But when you experience it, it look very very much like aliens. And not just looks like, it FEELS like something terrifying is going on, even if you WOULDN'T be freaked out anyway. So if you don't know about it, you may tend to assume you experienced something real, even though if an objective third party weighed up the evidence, "hallucination" would outweigh "demon".
Other times, the emotion itself is enjoyable or useful. Eg. optimism keeps us going when there's only a slim chance of success, which is useful when that's the only sensible gamble. But I don't think that optimists win the lottery more often, except insofar as they may PLAY more often.
And most poeple value love as part of the human condition and would want to keep it whether it were useful or not (also useful for forming families and perpetuating the species). And people in love often come to know each other much better than anyone else. And yet, most people THINK (i) they know each other really well and (ii) they are the only people who they will ever fall in love with, even if that's not based on experience of getting to know each other, but because they're teenage, just met, and full of hormones. But I think you would not find that experience love is a reliable guide to the TRUTH of those statements, it's more of a goal people aim for.
My suggestion, is that belief in God (or some other 'connection to the universe') is similar. We experience the urge to do it because it served a useful purpose and/or is a side-effect of something. But just because we hallucinate it, doesn't mean it's a reliable guide to what's actually TRUE!
But just because it's not true, doesn't mean it's abominable -- false beliefs can cause a lot of harm, and it's irresponsible to encourage people to believe them. But they can also be harmless or beneficial if indulged in responsibly -- nicer-tasting food is not necessarily better for us, but it's unexceptional to indulge in an equal quantity of nicer food if you can.
Historically, indulging the "connection to the universe" emotion has been often connected with "organised religion". But that's not always the case in either direction. And while in principle I don't think either are a good idea, I'm not sure whether or not going cold turky all at once is the best solution. Non-spiritual ritual can perform the same role in community building (eg. masons, flag-waving, atheist jews, etc) both good and bad, so feelings of God, while common, may not be unique.
As far as I know, this isn't for anything, it's just an failure of a failsafe that turned cf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_paralysis on while the mind was still partially awake. But when you experience it, it look very very much like aliens. And not just looks like, it FEELS like something terrifying is going on, even if you WOULDN'T be freaked out anyway. So if you don't know about it, you may tend to assume you experienced something real, even though if an objective third party weighed up the evidence, "hallucination" would outweigh "demon".
Other times, the emotion itself is enjoyable or useful. Eg. optimism keeps us going when there's only a slim chance of success, which is useful when that's the only sensible gamble. But I don't think that optimists win the lottery more often, except insofar as they may PLAY more often.
And most poeple value love as part of the human condition and would want to keep it whether it were useful or not (also useful for forming families and perpetuating the species). And people in love often come to know each other much better than anyone else. And yet, most people THINK (i) they know each other really well and (ii) they are the only people who they will ever fall in love with, even if that's not based on experience of getting to know each other, but because they're teenage, just met, and full of hormones. But I think you would not find that experience love is a reliable guide to the TRUTH of those statements, it's more of a goal people aim for.
My suggestion, is that belief in God (or some other 'connection to the universe') is similar. We experience the urge to do it because it served a useful purpose and/or is a side-effect of something. But just because we hallucinate it, doesn't mean it's a reliable guide to what's actually TRUE!
But just because it's not true, doesn't mean it's abominable -- false beliefs can cause a lot of harm, and it's irresponsible to encourage people to believe them. But they can also be harmless or beneficial if indulged in responsibly -- nicer-tasting food is not necessarily better for us, but it's unexceptional to indulge in an equal quantity of nicer food if you can.
Historically, indulging the "connection to the universe" emotion has been often connected with "organised religion". But that's not always the case in either direction. And while in principle I don't think either are a good idea, I'm not sure whether or not going cold turky all at once is the best solution. Non-spiritual ritual can perform the same role in community building (eg. masons, flag-waving, atheist jews, etc) both good and bad, so feelings of God, while common, may not be unique.