jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
I could never remember what the third collective terms for geese was (regardless of which two I thought of first), but looking it up we find:

Gaggle: on water
Flock: on land
Skein: when flying
Chevron: In V formation

But while some people draw these distinctions some people don't. I don't know if they're particularly used by people who talk about geese, or historically, or were just decided by someone who wrote an influential book. Everyone agrees about flying, it's flock and gaggle which get switched in most places.

OTOH, I came across http://www.birdnature.com/groupnames.html. Regardless of how many are really used, *all* the names are beautiful. Picked completely at random:

cauldron of raptors
charm of finches
company of parrots
convocation of eagles
exaltation of larks
raft of ducks
paddling of ducks

I want to be a bird now!

In other news, Dovescape is really cool. This is a magic card that turns any non-summoning spell into doves. How do you come up with that[1]? You'd never think of it, but it's so RIGHT. Can't you just imagine the magician casting, the lights and sounds going off, and then fwoom! A room full of doves in proportion to how powerful the spell was? This is how to make good rules (consider a magic card somewhere between a fluxx card and a penultima rule) -- you never think of it, but go "Ooh!" as soon as you see, and don't have to strain your brian to work out what it's going to do.

[1] Horses mouth

Date: 2006-05-31 07:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com
convocation of eagles
exaltation of larks


Those two at least I know, and have probably used at some point.

Date: 2006-05-31 10:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
The last one is a book (so I discovered). Do you use them in a "Look! Larks!" way or a "Ooh! Ooh! I can use an unusual and beautiful collective noun" way? I want to encourage as many as possible to stay/become the first as well as the second[1].

[1] And, ok, vice versa.

Date: 2006-05-31 07:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
you could always settle for pulling a bird or two...

Date: 2006-05-31 10:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Bzzzt! Repetition![1]

[1] Insofar as everyone in the world who isn't me is a gestalt entity playing Just a Minute to my Parsons.

Date: 2006-05-31 10:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
*binds Jack firmly*
*blindfolds Jack*

Now, behave while I have lunch

Date: 2006-05-31 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Why did I suddenly take that as a verb?

Date: 2006-05-31 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
because that was how it was used...

Date: 2006-05-31 11:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Doh! I mean, "Why did I suddenly take that verb as transitive?" :)

Date: 2006-05-31 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
/me has got her transitivesand intransitives muddled.

Date: 2006-05-31 11:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Don't get your transitives in a knot! I inferred you meant "eyebrow(i)" as in "Raise my eyebrow". I implied you meant "eyebrow(t)" as in "Caress me with your eyebrow"

Date: 2006-05-31 10:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
There's a reason I'm so aggravating

Date: 2006-05-31 10:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
maybe you should be a lecherer then

Date: 2006-05-31 10:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
I am, sometimes. Not everyone is as letch-worthy or as letch-appreciating as you are to me :)

Date: 2006-05-31 10:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
*blushes*

I'm lech-worthy?! hehehe

Thanks

Date: 2006-05-31 10:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
You look nice when you blush. But you know this. Our problem was never attractiveness, was it?

Date: 2006-05-31 10:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
*laughs*

I ought to make a new icon of one of those photos...

Date: 2006-05-31 11:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
LOL. I was expecting something non-work-safe somehow. (And a smaller file :)) You do indeed look very nice.

Though your current icon seems to work well -- completely casual, completely modest, but completely beautiful. Matthew works a camera well.

Date: 2006-05-31 11:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
mmmm. It's my favourite photo of self. The one emailed is also safe, but ... different somehow?

Ooops. Sorry 'bout the file size.

And he works a lot of things well. Seeing him friday! (cue ecstatic bouncy angels)

Date: 2006-05-31 11:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Yes, that's a good description. There's nothing explicit, but there's definitely, well, eyebrows, as it were. An indefinite aura of flirtation, which the icon doesn't have.

(Don't worry about it, I have lots of room, I was just surprised.)

ROFL. I hope the time goes quickly. Also, ooh, plural angels.

Date: 2006-05-31 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
Yes, I'm working on cloning...

Date: 2006-05-31 11:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Matthew and I could have a few dozen each. Think of how much you'd write if you could collaberate with yourself.

Date: 2006-05-31 11:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
Think how many people I'd kill if I could conspire with myself.

"It wasn't me, it was that clone. DNA proves it."

Date: 2006-05-31 11:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Probably could. Replication erros. But fingerprints is the easiest way :)

Date: 2006-05-31 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelofthenorth.livejournal.com
:)

And I think Matthew might be scrapping with you to have the clones...

Date: 2006-05-31 08:36 am (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
Bah. If there are different collective terms for geese on earth, on water and in air, then clearly the fourth collective term ought to be for when they're on fire!

Date: 2006-05-31 10:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Ooh, yes! I'm sure we could write a whole sketch about that.

"A hiss of geese" perhaps?

Date: 2006-05-31 10:23 am (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
[livejournal.com profile] xraycb points out that a close enough approximation to "on fire" might be "being cooked for Christmas dinner". Given that, I wonder if a crackling of geese might have roughly the right connotations?

Date: 2006-05-31 10:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Ooh, that works. Or maybe it should be time-dependant: a crackling only in decemeber. If there's one flaw in the three element system it's that once you understand it, you understand it, it doesn't all go grue-shaped in n000 years time.

Date: 2006-05-31 09:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] senji.livejournal.com
The eagles have pulled out!

Date: 2006-05-31 10:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
...

Does that have anything to with convoke, or is just a coming pun?