jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
Have I asked this before? I know I was *going* to ask it.

How do you use "gross" and "net"? In the context of tax and weight, they are well defined, meaning "before tax" and "after tax", and "with packaging and lorries" and "without" respectively respectively.

I had gained the impression that "net" meant "resultant", and correspondingly assumed "gross" meant "before modifications".

And then I saw the weight example, and was told that "gross" simply meant the larger, the one with the extras, and "net" the one without.

Then I saw someone describe the weight example from the point of view of the people wanting the end product, when "resultant" would be a good description after all.

Etymologically it seems "gross" came from "big" and "net" came from "neat" (in latin). I'm not sure of their later path.

I'm sure I've heard "net effect" to mean "resultant effect, the effect remaining when everything else has cancelled out" and want to use it in that sense, but is that a valid usage?

I couldn't find it discussed anywhere.

Date: 2007-08-21 02:20 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
I'd certainly consider "the net effect" as in the cumulative effect to be a perfectly normal usage of the word.

So I suppose I'd have to say that the unifying theme is that "net" means "effective", "at the end of the day" or "the bottom line": it's what you end up with, and it's what's important for whatever purpose you then plan to use it for. Your net salary is what determines your actual ability to buy things; the net effect of a bunch of forces acting on a mass is what determines its actual acceleration. "Net" means the important measurement.

Your net salary, in particular, is not net just because it's the smaller of the two figures, or because it's without some potentially-optional stuff; it's net because that optional stuff is stuff you don't end up with. If you were claiming tax back on your salary (let's suppose, for example, that your company insisted on deducting it at a fixed 40% rate, and you then had to negotiate with the tax office to get back the extra tax you'd thereby paid on everything below the higher-rate threshold), then your net salary would be the salary including the claimed-back tax.

"Gross", I think, just means big: "including lots of stuff".

Date: 2007-08-21 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Thanks. That's what I wanted to think (about net). But I was assured that it wasn't.

Do you think then net and gross might be the same for some thing? In the tax example I think I'd still use "gross" to mean "before tax" even if it were bigger afterward, as that's got so much history... But for something else it could be.

Date: 2007-08-21 02:33 pm (UTC)
mair_in_grenderich: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mair_in_grenderich
Do you think then net and gross might be the same for some thing?

Well, trivially, something that doesn't have anything to add-on/takeaway?

Date: 2007-08-21 02:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
*sigh* *hits you* :) I don't think it counts as the same if they're the same as everything else :) I meant, noticeably the same, as in more the same than other relevant quantifiers... :)

Date: 2007-08-21 02:34 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
If I were a charity accepting Gift-Aided donations, so that after receiving some money from a person I could then do some paperwork and get an extra chunk from the tax office to go with it, then I think it wouldn't cause me much mental gear-clashing to describe the sum including that reclaimed tax as both "net" (it's the money I end up being able to spend on my charitable purpose) and "gross" (it's inclusive of everything it might reasonably include).

Date: 2007-08-21 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cornute.livejournal.com
Sure, take for instance... some fruit, say an apple, an orange, and a handful of seedless grapes, not on the stem, all the same gross weight. The net weight, the bit you can eat, would be less for the apple (because of the core) and the orange (peel and seeds) but for the grapes it would be the same as the gross, because you eat all of them.

If you eat grapes, that is, because if you don't I'm just comparing apples to oranges, and we know that never works.

Date: 2007-08-21 05:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
I don't have my own etymological dictionary, but there's one online that's always proven reliable in the past.

For 'net', it says ""remaining after deductions," 1520, from earlier sense of "trim, elegant, clean, neat" (c.1300), from O.Fr. net "clean, pure, bright" (from the same source as neat, q.v.), meaning infl. by It. netto "remaining after deductions." The verb in the sense of "to gain as a net sum" is first recorded 1758."

And for 'neat' it says "1542, "clean, free from dirt," from Anglo-Fr. neit, from O.Fr. net "clear, pure," from L. nitidus "well-favored, elegant, trim," lit. "gleaming," from nitere "to shine," from PIE base *nei-/*ni- "to shine" (cf. M.Ir. niam "gleam, splendor," niamda "shining;" O.Ir. noib "holy," niab "strength;" Welsh nwyfiant "gleam, splendor"). Meaning "inclined to be tidy" is from 1577. Sense of "straight liquor" is c.1800, from meaning "unadulterated" (of wine), first attested 1579. Informal sense of "very good" first recorded 1934 in Amer.Eng.; variant neato is teenager slang, first recorded 1968. Neatnik "excessively tidy person" is from 1959 (see -nik)."

This is a good reference in that it does give different stages of the word with dates, but it may not be complete and doesn't give a straight semantic progression (if that's known for this word).

Date: 2007-08-22 05:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Ooh, etymology. Thank you :)

Actually, I *had* heard of that dictionary -- presumably from you or vyvyan. But I'd forgotten it.

Date: 2007-08-21 05:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
Meant to say, the dictionary is here.

It gives the following for 'gross' as well: "c.1347, from O.Fr. gros "big, thick, coarse," from L.L. grossus "thick, coarse (of food or mind)," of obscure origin, not in classical L. Said to be unrelated to L. crassus, which meant the same thing, or to Ger. gross "large," but said to be cognate with O.Ir. bres, M.Ir. bras "big." Its meaning forked in M.E., to "glaring, flagrant, monstrous" on the one hand and "entire, total, whole" on the other. Meaning "disgusting" is first recorded 1958 in U.S. student slang, from earlier use as an intensifier of unpleasant things (gross stupidity, etc.). Noun sense of "a dozen dozen" is from O.Fr. grosse douzaine "large dozen;" sense of "total profit" (opposed to net) is from 1523. Gross national product first recorded 1947."

Date: 2007-08-22 05:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Wait, Fr "gros" meaning large, is unrelated to Ger "gross" and English "gross", also meaning large? I was kind of imagining that connection when I was guessing what "gross" meant in this context...

By the way, don't google for "French, gross" (unless you want advice about kissing).

Date: 2007-08-23 05:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
Hmm, Torsten would know if this is true, it's his thing (he knows all the cognate words in every language ever!) :)

*lol*

Date: 2007-08-23 05:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
I thought you were going to say "...is an expert on bad kissing" :)

Date: 2007-08-23 09:49 pm (UTC)
mair_in_grenderich: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mair_in_grenderich
*jack's entire f'list google for "French, gross"*.

I didn't get any results about kissing, but I did get this, which doesn't answer your question at all.

Date: 2007-08-24 02:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
LOL. You wouldn't *think* they'd want to :) That's funny. My search must have been different, but I can't remember what it was.

Active Recent Entries