jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a4_184.html

Straight dope asks "How can you suck a strand of spaghetti?" The question being, sucking a liquid, you create a vacuum in your mouth, and it's generally enough to say the pressure within the liquid is less than that in the mouth, so a force acts on the liquid in the straw. Sucking a solid object (eg. pencil), you can say the air pressure cancels out all over, except down the length.

But spaghetti is floppy. The air pressure on the *end* of the strand can't be relevant, because pushing their wouldn't force it into the mouth.

The answer doesn't seem very satisfactory. I'm sure it's something like, air pressure generally acts all over the surface, perpendicular to it, and this cancels out all over[1]. Except on a line through the part of the strand through the lips. So there's a force on that part, propagated down the strand to the next bend (where it acts sideways to the strand).

But I can't really put that into words (or symbols). Can anyone else provide a simple, satisfying description?

[1] May be hard to show, either by common sense or integrals, but we know it *does* because the net air pressure on a strand of spaghetti in midair (neglecting variations with height) is zero everywhere.

Date: 2008-01-24 06:53 pm (UTC)
liv: cartoon of me with long plait, teapot and purple outfit (Default)
From: [personal profile] liv
I don't think you can suck spaghetti. When you slurp up a strand of spaghetti, you use your mouth and lips to manipulate the spag into your mouth, it's hardly to do with the pressure difference at all. You might suck the last couple of cm, but by that point the floppiness isn't such a big deal. I think the people in that thread are thinking too hard about the maths and not about the real world physical problem described.

Date: 2008-01-24 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
It happened on the Simpsons!

It didn't occur to me the answer might be *that* wrong. I never have, but it sounded right to me. Hold on while I boil a strand of spaghetti.

Date: 2008-01-25 12:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
I just tried it. It was a half strand, but it sucked very effectively indeed, and I didn't seem to do any manipulation, I just sucked, and whooph, it was slapping me in the face and inside my mouth.

Date: 2008-01-25 12:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
(About four inches, but that's about the amount that would be suspended, right/maybe?)

Date: 2008-01-25 05:48 am (UTC)
liv: cartoon of me with long plait, teapot and purple outfit (Default)
From: [personal profile] liv
You actually tried it! That is so cool. Totally, empirical evidence wins over speculation.

Date: 2008-01-25 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
:)

Well, of course. We still need some theory, but it was really easy to try, and I didn't have enough faith in our speculation to assume it was right. And I was right because the result really surprised me (though maybe not hairyears) :) I admit I felt a little silly boiling a single strand of spaghetti and then sucking it in and out repeatedly, but we all have to make sacrifices in the cause of science :)

So now we have evidence, and we have a theory that fits the evidence, and we just need to come up with some confirming experiments.

Date: 2008-01-25 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alextfish.livejournal.com
You made me laugh out loud :) What a mental image!

Date: 2008-01-25 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Oh, wow, good! I mean, *I* thought it was funny (although not exceptionally so, I often do odd things and have stopped feeling that's a big deal), but I had no hope I would be able to capture it in words, I'm really glad :)