jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a4_184.html

Straight dope asks "How can you suck a strand of spaghetti?" The question being, sucking a liquid, you create a vacuum in your mouth, and it's generally enough to say the pressure within the liquid is less than that in the mouth, so a force acts on the liquid in the straw. Sucking a solid object (eg. pencil), you can say the air pressure cancels out all over, except down the length.

But spaghetti is floppy. The air pressure on the *end* of the strand can't be relevant, because pushing their wouldn't force it into the mouth.

The answer doesn't seem very satisfactory. I'm sure it's something like, air pressure generally acts all over the surface, perpendicular to it, and this cancels out all over[1]. Except on a line through the part of the strand through the lips. So there's a force on that part, propagated down the strand to the next bend (where it acts sideways to the strand).

But I can't really put that into words (or symbols). Can anyone else provide a simple, satisfying description?

[1] May be hard to show, either by common sense or integrals, but we know it *does* because the net air pressure on a strand of spaghetti in midair (neglecting variations with height) is zero everywhere.

Date: 2008-01-25 12:51 am (UTC)
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
From: [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com
A simple refutation of the 'manipulation' theory is to coat the spaghetti in oil (or pesto, which is tastier): note how much easier it is to suck in, and how much harder it is to 'mumble' it up into your mouth.

Now repeat the experiment with cold spagetti that's been left out in the air for half an hour: it's still floppy and compressible, but the surface is sticky. Try sucking that in! Manipulating it inwards with your lips is now easier, but still far less efficient than applying suction.

This does nothing to prove or disprove my theory of how the suction works.