jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/01/02/weden02.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/01/02/ixworld.html

"The centrepiece of the museum is a series of huge model dinosaurs, built by the former head of design at Universal Studios, which are portrayed as existing alongside man, contrary to received scientific opinion that they lived millions of years apart."

"Mr Ham is particularly proud of a planned reconstruction of the interior of Noah's Ark. 'You will hear the water lapping, feel the Ark rocking and perhaps even hear people outside screaming,' he said. More controversial exhibits deal with diseases and famine, which are portrayed not as random disasters, but as the result of mankind's sin."

"Elsewhere, animated figures will be used to recreate the Garden of Eden, while in another room, visitors will see a tyrannosaurus rex pursuing Adam and Eve after their fall from grace. "That's the real terror that Adam's sin unleashed," visitors will be warned."

However, I would like to commend the article's author, who seems to well avoid breaking impartiality by, for instance, describing what received scientific knowledge says, and what Ham interprets the bible as saying, without saying either is true.

Date: 2005-01-09 09:34 pm (UTC)
fanf: (Default)
From: [personal profile] fanf
Why would it be breaking impartiality to state that the museum is full of lies?

Date: 2005-01-10 11:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Well, that's what impartiallity is, isn't it? One has to aknowledge popular but stupid points of view. To some people, many of my beliefs are stupid, but it makes life easier for everyone if they acnoweldge what they are.

So, hopefully, we compromise: people don't say "vegetarianism is stupid" but "most people think vegetarianism is stupid" and I don't say "the earth is 1x1010 years old" (except in company where it's understood) but "we've found trees older than 6000 years, and as for mountains..."

Or something.

Date: 2005-01-10 02:40 pm (UTC)
fanf: (Default)
From: [personal profile] fanf
Impartiality should be tempered by the fact that some points of view deserve more respect than others.

Date: 2005-01-10 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
True. And I yearn to agree. Especially since acnowledging that a belief is widespread makes it acceptable in a way that if it were new it wouldn't be. But wehn I do, I feel I'm just ignoring it and pretending that it will go away, when it won't soon.

Date: 2005-01-10 03:13 pm (UTC)
fanf: (Default)
From: [personal profile] fanf
If you can't bear to deprive them of the oxygen of publicity, taunt them.

Date: 2005-01-10 03:19 pm (UTC)