jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/01/02/weden02.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/01/02/ixworld.html

"The centrepiece of the museum is a series of huge model dinosaurs, built by the former head of design at Universal Studios, which are portrayed as existing alongside man, contrary to received scientific opinion that they lived millions of years apart."

"Mr Ham is particularly proud of a planned reconstruction of the interior of Noah's Ark. 'You will hear the water lapping, feel the Ark rocking and perhaps even hear people outside screaming,' he said. More controversial exhibits deal with diseases and famine, which are portrayed not as random disasters, but as the result of mankind's sin."

"Elsewhere, animated figures will be used to recreate the Garden of Eden, while in another room, visitors will see a tyrannosaurus rex pursuing Adam and Eve after their fall from grace. "That's the real terror that Adam's sin unleashed," visitors will be warned."

However, I would like to commend the article's author, who seems to well avoid breaking impartiality by, for instance, describing what received scientific knowledge says, and what Ham interprets the bible as saying, without saying either is true.

Date: 2005-01-11 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
I believe some people say some words in the bible commonly translated as 'great beasts' or 'leviathans' refer to things that left bones that people dubbed dinosaurs. And didn they actually say that about fossils? I'm not *surprised* they did[1] but didn't see it myself.

The most extreme sorts of fundamentalist seem unalienable, since God being more important than logic, there seems to be no stigma[2] attached to holding two contradictory beliefs.

[1] As people do. Despite the theological quandries that the devil is traditionally described as offering temptation only, being consigned to hell.

[2] pi