jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
1. I'm happier when I'm ahead of my notional schedule.
2. I'm also more productive.
3. Which means if I'm ahead, I tend to STAY ahead, and if I'm behind, I tend to procrastinate, which makes it much worse.
4. So if I can just meet some small targets by working first and playing later, my life will snowball into one massive success, and I'd be happy.
5. I want to be happy.
6. Therefore, I should post of livejournal now.
7. Profit.

Date: 2005-01-13 11:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
OK, I'm being dim, why is that bad?

Date: 2005-01-13 12:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
Because it sounds so incredibly pretentious...

Date: 2005-01-13 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Oh, I see. But you brought it up...

Besides, wouldn't it be relevent if you wished to emphasise that you were making a logical deduction, not just a general sort of inference? :)

Date: 2005-01-13 06:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
Doesn't 'therefore' sort of imply that what you're about to say is the next logical step? If not, I think *all* logic should be written in Latin :)

Date: 2005-01-13 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Well, mostly. But it doesn't quite have the same gravitas -- I'd say therefore would be more likely to encompass hidden assumptions than ergo.

And most formal logic *is*. Or at least, uses "ergo" :)

Date: 2005-01-16 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
Using 'ergo' is SO not the same as being all in Latin :)