jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
DVD:

No need to rewind
Easy skip ahead
Menus to view different options non-linearly
Subtitles
Small storage space

Video:

Built-in ability to skip stupid intros, piracy ads, menus, etc
Low hassle recording
Cheap
No stupid bonus features

Date: 2008-05-06 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
Where do you get them for 8p each? I'm after a supplier before James runs out... :)

Date: 2008-05-06 12:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com
Some random website I googled had them for 8p ea...

Personally I'd use SVP to buy such things, and the cheapest ones they have there are 10p ea ... http://svp.co.uk/

Date: 2008-05-06 12:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com
Do you know whether you want + or - media?

- is older, slightly more compatible (really old players only support -). + is newer and slightly better technically.

All modern DVD recorders / players will support both formats.

Date: 2008-05-06 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
The only type I've used is -, possibly because when I first got used to the type of CD/DVD I wanted to buy, I knew that + wasn't universally supported. But that's more of a habit than anything. Is - still more common?

Date: 2008-05-06 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com
I would expect anything made in the last 5 years to support + as well as - (note: some players exist that support + only, it's not that everything supports - and some things don't support +).

Wikipedia tells me - is probably more common, although it's not sure - and it suggests that almost all players that are around today are multiformat + and -.

+ is slightly better technically. - has slightly more supported players around. In real terms it probably makes no difference which you choose.