jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
Would it be worth having an "unlikely" mark for a spelling checker? For those occasions when it's entirely possible you did mean "licens (n, ceremonial greek fireplace)"[1], but it's overwhelmingly more likely you meant the common word "license"?

It would have to be visually represented as not requiring you to get rid of it, but merely to draw your attention to it, if that's possible. On the other hand, you could argue that's what spelling checkers ought to do anyway, although they are not normally treated like that. At least, "not in dictionary" is a clear judgement, even if the writing is correct (grammar "checkers" results really are all "suggested").

Come to think of it, maybe there's an uncomfortable parallel with compiler warnings?

[1] Warning, not an actual definition.
[2] I think perhaps the "one-liner" tag, as misleading as it has become, represents the nearest I ever come to a single contained thought, rather than a fifteen interrelated ones.

Date: 2008-10-16 12:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Indeed.

Although even if not you could have the option to move the words to the main dictionary (or equivalent), which wouldn't be worse than a spell checker which left them out completely would be.

I'm sure big-name spell-checkers do have context-dependent things (or even just different custom dictionaries for different users), so you can have a "writing fantasy fic" dictionary and a "writing cv dictionary".