jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
Tomorrow is a bank holiday, isn't it?

After ascerning that it definitely was easter tomorrow, and very nearly but not quite getting my program to compile in every configeration, mum and dad picked me up from work.

Ambiguity had been kept *mostly* as decent as it had been made the last parent-visit :) and I'd done the last of the washing-up and a bit of vaccuuming the night before, so it was acceptable. I made dinner mainly from frozen components, which was quite nice though, and I think it impressed mum that I'd settled in enough that I could produce dinner for everyone without any faff. It also reminded me of two beliefs: (1) that food looks more professional if it comes in half a dozen different portions on the plate instead of a big mix and (2) any room looks tidier if you empty and clean any table and put it in the middle

Like Mornington Crescent would be, if it wasn't Mornington Crescent

Then Dad and I went to the Golden Hind and played pool. He won, but I *am* getting slowly better :) And while we were waiting for the table, and discussing money-putting-down etiquette[2]. And while we were waiting we played beggar-my-neighbour[3] and had much fun pretending it to be a game with skill, saying things like "Aha! Little did you know I was saving a jack in reserve" and "Oh no! I didn't see that coming at all!"

In fact, it was quite like mornington crescent. Which reminds me of *last* saturday, which I completely failed to spod, when we played 'London' at Owen's belated housewarming, which really is best described as "Like mornington crescent, but not" because it is a game which REALLY IS about moving dice-thrown numbers along underground tracks, trying to get to six designated stations. There was also a mao-like game, except that the new rules were predetermined of the form of 'play n cards per round' and the like.

[1] Sorry for the blasphemous joke. I couldn't resist.
[2] I described my observations as "Anyone can put the price of a game on the edge of the table and they play in that order. Whether they play a person of their choice or the previous winner is implementation defined. How many games you can by at once is undefined."[4] Does that sound accurate?
[3] Half the pack each. Always play from the top of your pile. Play alternately. But when a J,Q,K or A appears the other player plays 1,2,3 or 4 cards and you collect the whole discard pile, unless one of those cards is itself a J,Q,K or A in which case it the first player has to play 1,2..etc.
[4] Except I didn't say it in those words because I was talking to dad who isn't a C programmer. But I translated it for geekblogging :)

Date: 2005-03-29 03:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
Nah. No fun to pick on people I didn't know.

BTW, apparently Drew ROFL when I mentioned that my male friends didn't like copious quantities of endearments. He thought it really sad that you're not all 'man enough' to take it.

The concept of culture differences seems to have totally passed him by.

Date: 2005-03-29 03:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
!! Did you tell him *which* endearments you were using? :)

Date: 2005-03-29 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
This was still at the 'honey' and 'sweetie' stage :)

I don't think you're less of a man. I think it's all just macho posturing. *puts on mid-West accent* "Come sit on my knee, ma'am, and call me sugar-puff"

Ok, that was pretty lame, but you know what I mean

Date: 2005-03-29 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Ah, yes, I think I see. Though some of it is the *way* you say sweetie :)

Though I'm still a bit confused by the whole middle paragraph :)

Date: 2005-03-29 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
Ah, yes, I think I see. Though some of it is the *way* you say sweetie :)

OK, now I'm genuinely confused. How do I say it that makes it weird/irritating?

Though I'm still a bit confused by the whole middle paragraph :)

Oh, that. I don't know, I get the impression he's trying to prove how much of a man he is by mocking my friends. Which is irritating.

Date: 2005-03-29 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
OK, now I'm genuinely confused. How do I say it that makes it weird/irritating?

A lot! :)

No, sorry. I didn't mean you specifically, I meant that one can say 'honey' in different ways: as a casual friendly name the way people use 'pet' in brum and up north; as an endearment some people would find sweet and some sickening; to tease friends because they don't; etc.

Oh, that. I don't know, I get the impression he's trying to prove how much of a man he is by mocking my friends. Which is irritating.

And weird. I guess it's that he's more mature than me, because I get irrationally anoyed by 'snookie' and he doesn't :) But still odd.

Date: 2005-03-29 03:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
And weird. I guess it's that he's more mature than me, because I get irrationally anoyed by 'snookie' and he doesn't :) But still odd.

Yeah, he's winding me up a bit. I think his time as my beta's come to and end.

Don't sell yourself short: you're the only snookiedums for me.

(Ok, we need to change topic soon, because that term is really beginning to lose its impact)

Date: 2005-03-29 04:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Aww, thanks you. Never have I been less annoyed to be called snookiedums :) But it's ok; I was mainly meaning that's what he meant. What I think my opinion of snookiedums says about my maturity I don't venture an opinion on :)

(Ok, we need to change topic soon, because that term is really beginning to lose its impact)

We could talk about honey. Or cutesypie. Or darling. Or dahling. Or bablicious :)

Date: 2005-03-29 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
I like cutesypie, hate darling/dahling. Bablicious needs to have an extra 'e', or it sounds too much like 'babbilicious', which I also like :)

Date: 2005-03-29 05:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
You also like? Does that mean you do like 'babelicious'? :)

Date: 2005-03-29 06:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
Yes, smoochikins, I adore it :)

Date: 2005-03-29 06:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
OK, I'll use it at every opportunity, Dumpling :)

Date: 2005-03-29 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com

DUMPLING???



That's what my parents call me when they're trying to persuade me to go on a diet! Not loving it, sadly

Date: 2005-03-29 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
That was the idea, smoochikins. Again, it doesn't mean I think you're podgy (in this case I *don't*) it's just a *wonderful* way to tease you :)

Soon I'll be able to string a whole sentence together from words that make you shout aloud in blue :)

Date: 2005-03-29 06:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
Huh. *checks out wordsmyth for alternative words to 'sulk'*

I seriously need to come up with some new endearments, my silly little sausage :)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-29 07:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-29 07:21 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-29 07:24 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-29 09:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-29 09:09 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-30 10:28 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-30 11:02 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-30 11:33 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-30 11:38 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-30 11:44 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-30 11:53 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-30 12:24 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-30 04:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-31 09:31 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2005-03-29 06:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
This is a pretty weird competition to be having, huh?

Date: 2005-03-29 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
There was a marvellous bit in one of the Neal Stephenson books where Dappa (freed slave) remarked to Daniel (mathmo protaganist) that they were having a strange conversation, and he replied that it rated barely 2 or 3 on his scale, (from 1=normal to 10=weirdest ever) where he often had two conversations rating 6 or 7 in a day, and Charles (bigoted dandy journalist) came up and began to explain how this related to politics to Dappa, but he kept assuming Dappa couldn't think, and was just well trained (eg. "I speak 15 languages" "Wow! Your old master must have been exceptionally erudite!"), and began to explain England resisting France by analogy to two baboons fighting for dominance, and Daniel described journalism as them flinging faeces at each other, but in such a way as Charles didn't see the insult, and eventually Charles asked Dappa leading questions about Eliza (female lead) and Dappa said he didn't think he should fling faeces at her; and when Charles left, Daniel said "Before you ask, that was a 10."

I feel like that a lot of the time. Dave Hodge scores a +3 bonus to any conversation, and CUWOCS doesn't hurt either :)

Date: 2005-03-29 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
That sounds fun actually :) I really must check him out again one of these days

Date: 2005-03-29 06:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
I love him but he's a bit hard to get into, and unfortunately the baroque cycle is the worst for that.

I'd recommend you start by reading Diamond Age, or maybe Snow Crash, which are easier to get into, and if you like the style try Cryptonomicon, which is far and away my favorite.

Date: 2005-03-29 06:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
Cool. I'll see what my library has.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-29 06:59 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-29 09:10 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-30 10:29 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-30 11:03 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2005-03-29 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Babblicious is great, though.

Date: 2005-03-29 06:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
I don't mind that one :)

Date: 2005-03-29 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
It could be construed as implying an insult... :)

Date: 2005-03-29 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com
Hell, I know I babble :)

Date: 2005-03-29 06:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
And if you *were* fat, would you then not object to dumpling? I know I would :) So it's not just that :) It's that we *like* your babbling. I don't know where this is going, I was just thinking aloud.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nakedtoes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-29 06:59 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-03-29 07:06 pm (UTC) - Expand