jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
http://jimhines.livejournal.com/724969.html

This post describes a productivity vs anxiety graph as a bell curve: no anxiety and you don't work on something at all; too much and you're too terrified to start.

What I take away is that if someone isn't doing something you think they should, the right answer isn't always "come up with more and more and more reasons why they should". If their problem was "they couldn't be bothered", that will help. But if the problem is "they're paralysed by terror", making it MORE urgent will make it HARDER to start, not easier.

I feel, when I'm procrastinating, I'm often in the "paralysed" state. And I feel people should be entitled to say "get on and do it" to me, but that if they want to help, it would be more useful to start by asking "do you want more urgency or more reassurance" and provide whichever I ask for.

Contrariwise, if it's something I've promised to do, and someone's dependant on that, it's my responsibility to manage my internal emotional state, not theirs, and I can't expect someone at work etc to automatically accommodate me. But I've tried to get better at recognising the problem, and asking for what I need, rather than just assuming that what I need isn't obvious, I'm wrong for needing it.

Date: 2014-03-19 08:57 pm (UTC)
ptc24: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ptc24
I've been know to say of my SSRIs: "they take away a lot of unnecessary anxiety, but also some necessary anxiety too". In some cases, it seems that the gap between too much anxiety and too little is razor-thin or non-existent, but not always.

I wonder... if the performance-vs-anxiety graph is as drawn, and anxiety - or for that matter d(anxiety)/dt - is inversely proportional (or negatively proportional) to some average of recent performance... what would the dynamics be like?

Active Recent Entries