I could have found an answer that fitted this question and yesterdays question both, but I decided they were interesting in different ways.
Technological innovations I think we're groping towards, which I'm impatient to have already:
A programming language with a syntax as straightforward as python, but works like C++14 is trying to, of letting it all compile to blazing fast code, even for embedded systems, by default, but letting you easily use dynamic typing where you actually want it. And of letting you use static type checking MOST of the time, but lets you be as dynamic as you need when you actually need it.
Widespread 3D printing of replacement parts, etc. We're nearly there, but we're waiting for a slightly wider variety of materials, and a wider database of possible things. Where you can say "I want this £10 widget holder from the supermarket, but can I get one 30% longer if I pay extra? OK? Thank you!"
Private cars replaced by mega-fleets of robot taxis and universal good public transport throughout/between all population dense areas.
Everyone uses git, or another dvcs, and the interface is actually consistent and friendly for everybody.
Decent, standardised, change-tracking and formatting for non-plain-text documents that allows sensible merging. (OK, this seems to be two steps forward and three steps back, so maybe there's no point waiting for it, but I'd still like it! :))
Technological innovations I think we're groping towards, which I'm impatient to have already:
A programming language with a syntax as straightforward as python, but works like C++14 is trying to, of letting it all compile to blazing fast code, even for embedded systems, by default, but letting you easily use dynamic typing where you actually want it. And of letting you use static type checking MOST of the time, but lets you be as dynamic as you need when you actually need it.
Widespread 3D printing of replacement parts, etc. We're nearly there, but we're waiting for a slightly wider variety of materials, and a wider database of possible things. Where you can say "I want this £10 widget holder from the supermarket, but can I get one 30% longer if I pay extra? OK? Thank you!"
Private cars replaced by mega-fleets of robot taxis and universal good public transport throughout/between all population dense areas.
Everyone uses git, or another dvcs, and the interface is actually consistent and friendly for everybody.
Decent, standardised, change-tracking and formatting for non-plain-text documents that allows sensible merging. (OK, this seems to be two steps forward and three steps back, so maybe there's no point waiting for it, but I'd still like it! :))
no subject
Date: 2014-12-07 04:31 pm (UTC)I need to actually try this. I think "non-friendly" is related to several different things: one is people who don't grok command lines at all; one is the fact that the syntaxes to the command line tools are invariably inconsistent with each other in ways designed to make common tasks simple, but prevent easily generalising syntax; one is that it works on a somewhat different mental model to previous VCS (so people who are experience with SVN etc sometimes find it HARDER than someone who's never used VCS at all); one is that you can do quite complicated things but there may not always be a "right" way to do them. I'm not sure if you can fix all those things at once (but hopefully...)
no subject
Date: 2014-12-07 05:20 pm (UTC)The problem is the command line - and you can easily avoid that by using a tool like Eclipse (or various others).