I could have found an answer that fitted this question and yesterdays question both, but I decided they were interesting in different ways.
Technological innovations I think we're groping towards, which I'm impatient to have already:
A programming language with a syntax as straightforward as python, but works like C++14 is trying to, of letting it all compile to blazing fast code, even for embedded systems, by default, but letting you easily use dynamic typing where you actually want it. And of letting you use static type checking MOST of the time, but lets you be as dynamic as you need when you actually need it.
Widespread 3D printing of replacement parts, etc. We're nearly there, but we're waiting for a slightly wider variety of materials, and a wider database of possible things. Where you can say "I want this £10 widget holder from the supermarket, but can I get one 30% longer if I pay extra? OK? Thank you!"
Private cars replaced by mega-fleets of robot taxis and universal good public transport throughout/between all population dense areas.
Everyone uses git, or another dvcs, and the interface is actually consistent and friendly for everybody.
Decent, standardised, change-tracking and formatting for non-plain-text documents that allows sensible merging. (OK, this seems to be two steps forward and three steps back, so maybe there's no point waiting for it, but I'd still like it! :))
Technological innovations I think we're groping towards, which I'm impatient to have already:
A programming language with a syntax as straightforward as python, but works like C++14 is trying to, of letting it all compile to blazing fast code, even for embedded systems, by default, but letting you easily use dynamic typing where you actually want it. And of letting you use static type checking MOST of the time, but lets you be as dynamic as you need when you actually need it.
Widespread 3D printing of replacement parts, etc. We're nearly there, but we're waiting for a slightly wider variety of materials, and a wider database of possible things. Where you can say "I want this £10 widget holder from the supermarket, but can I get one 30% longer if I pay extra? OK? Thank you!"
Private cars replaced by mega-fleets of robot taxis and universal good public transport throughout/between all population dense areas.
Everyone uses git, or another dvcs, and the interface is actually consistent and friendly for everybody.
Decent, standardised, change-tracking and formatting for non-plain-text documents that allows sensible merging. (OK, this seems to be two steps forward and three steps back, so maybe there's no point waiting for it, but I'd still like it! :))
no subject
Date: 2014-12-08 03:19 pm (UTC)The very easiest thing your transit company could do is paint on the platform where the accessible car will be (and put it always in the same place); I wonder why this isn't done? The E* platform is painted with coach numbers for instance. That would need them to buy only a can of paint! There's a huge reluctance to paying for batter public transport, even in places where you have to play sardines if you want to use it to commute; I'm not really clear why that is, but it sucks.
no subject
Date: 2014-12-08 04:37 pm (UTC)I wait at the "if you are on wheels board here" place. It doesn't always work.