jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
When someone responds to something you said (online or IRL) but not to what you think you said, but rather something vaguely related to it (because you wrote too quickly or they were reading too quickly), how do you respond constructively?

It always FEELS as if they're rejecting what what you were trying to say, and I have to try hard to suppress the urge to argue them down. When I know that that would actually be meaningless to them, and they're thinking "why did you say [thoguhtless thing]".

In some ways I find it easier IRL because the conversation moves on, I can make a bid to miss out the long digression of people arguing past each other, and say what I said a different way, or ask them for clarification, and the conversation can proceed from there. Whereas, if it's an online comment, it can itch at me, wanting to rebut an apparently nonsensical comment on what I was trying to say, but it's harder to channel into a constructive conversation, because I don't know how to say "what do you think about [better phrasing of what I was trying to say]" without sounding critical or patronising to them; and without feeling forced to take a side on what they actually said, even if I feel it's a red herring.

Date: 2015-01-27 03:34 am (UTC)
commodorified: a capital m, in fancy type, on a coloured background (Default)
From: [personal profile] commodorified
I generally start out with "I clearly phrased that badly; I was in a hurry, (optional: ugh, sorry, I'm sorry for that, I'm truly sorry for the implication, Oh Crap I'm Sorry That Sounded Horrible I am So Sorry as appropriate). What I MEANT to say was..."

Date: 2015-01-27 03:37 am (UTC)
seryn: flowers (Default)
From: [personal profile] seryn
I like purple herring. Or whatever color of herring doesn't actually exist, maybe that's red, but it's been referred to so often that the collective unconscious has probably created it.

Do people there say, "Your kilometerage may vary."?

No one *I* know responds to comments I leave on your posts. You don't respond to comments I leave on your posts. If I'm talking to myself anyway, I'd rather have the 4% chance of getting someone to talk back that holding my own conversation will do.

Date: 2015-01-27 04:26 am (UTC)
wild_irises: (mirror cat)
From: [personal profile] wild_irises
This comment just made me want to reply to you.

Date: 2015-01-27 09:31 am (UTC)
rmc28: Rachel in hockey gear on the frozen fen at Upware, near Cambridge (Default)
From: [personal profile] rmc28
One of my colleagues at work accidentally said "dead herring" one day, and it's become part of our vocabulary.

Date: 2015-01-27 04:25 am (UTC)
wild_irises: (fight derailing)
From: [personal profile] wild_irises
I say something like what [personal profile] commodorified said above, and then I rephrase, but in a perfect world I don't ask if that's better for them, and I don't try to respond to what they did say. I let them take the lead on my corrected language.

Date: 2015-01-27 08:57 am (UTC)
ptc24: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ptc24
Ooooh, another way in which IRL conversation is better because it is worse - as in, it has technical limitations that have beneficial effects.

Or is this just a special case of "IRL conversation is more ephemeral than online, it's easier just to let something drop" which was sort-of on my list already?

Date: 2015-01-27 11:12 pm (UTC)
spaceoperadiva: little jellical cat in a sink (Default)
From: [personal profile] spaceoperadiva
I feel that I am the queen of vaguely related asides and codicils. I try to stay on subject, really I do, but sometimes there's this shiny side point sparkling at me and I can't resist.

Date: 2015-01-28 05:06 pm (UTC)
spaceoperadiva: little jellical cat in a sink (Default)
From: [personal profile] spaceoperadiva
I totally understand the frustration of "That's all wrong because. . ." and then this is followed by me at least, with the re-reading the thing I wrote 15 times trying to figure out how they got there.