Meta-ok and Meta-right

[jack]

I'm not sure if this is the best terminology, but I found it useful to have a name for the concept at all. I'd like one that was clear to people other than me :)

The idea is, "meta-right" means "the right decision given the information available, which may or may not have been correct omnisciently". Like:

Q. I put the colander in the utensils cupboard, was that right?
A. That was meta-right. [ie. it actually goes in the pan cupboard but I didn't expect you to know that, and thank you for helping tidy up, I'm glad you helped and took sensible guesses]

Q. I gambled on X, but it actually came up Y. Do you think that was meta-right?
A. I'm not sure, do you think you had any way to know, or was X your best guess?

Similarly, "meta-ok" when you ask if something is ok. Eg.

Q. Is it ok I was late home?
A. It was meta-ok.

Meaning, it's ok that you're late home SOMETIMES, and this time was no worse than any other time. But it's not necessarily ok if you're ALWAYS late home.

But is there a better way of describing this?

Comments

[rysmiel]

Oh, sorry, I really did not mean that as anything wanting apology from you; it was meant by way as a pre-emptive apology from me in case your dw logging did anything weird in the same way that, for example, Google went weird at work this morning, thought everyone from the entire institution I was working at was the same person and threw multiple captchas on every search any of us did because it thought we had a ridiculously high usage frequency for one address.

I'm totally good if this is not inconveniencing you; can our mutual apologies and so forth cancel out and leave us both OK here ?

[jack]

*hugs* OK, no worries, I'm glad it's ok. Sorry for worrying. That's really bizarre, I guess that would cause problems, but I don't think DW tries to do anything clever, it just remembers the IP in case it's needed later.