jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
Hey, there *is* a Zelazny film! Why did no-one tell me? I didn't know till I looked down at the book I was reading and it said "Now a Sensational[1] 20th century fox film".

Admittedly, it doesn't look like I'm missing much, the film converted the antihero Hell Tanner into Jeff Hale, I mean a random all american airforce officer not-Hell Tanner, and decided no post-apocalyptic world was complete without mutant cockroaches.

OTOH, it was a reasonable choice -- one of Zelazney's books that *is* set on earth, without a lot of special effects. As much as I'd like to see Lord of Light, I appreciate it could be tricky[2].

[1] Sensational: I guess bad emotions are technically sensational :)
[2] Blasphemous is often the word used. I'm not sure -- I interpreted it as having the fairly clear message that impersonating gods is bad, mmkay? but I can see others.

Date: 2005-09-02 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
True. Doh, my hypocriticalmeter has just gone off: I wouldn't have objected to a film dissing the christian god. (Amazing Pullman got away with it, really...:)) But it might be a factor in getting a big budget film, whether or not it'd provoke actual armed response.

Then again, "What Dreams May Come" for instance (Robin Williams goes to heaven, and kicks himself because his wife committed suicide and is in hell) seemed a scathing satire on a lot of people's unthinking beliefs to me, but most people thought it was feel-good, I think.