jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
Hey, there *is* a Zelazny film! Why did no-one tell me? I didn't know till I looked down at the book I was reading and it said "Now a Sensational[1] 20th century fox film".

Admittedly, it doesn't look like I'm missing much, the film converted the antihero Hell Tanner into Jeff Hale, I mean a random all american airforce officer not-Hell Tanner, and decided no post-apocalyptic world was complete without mutant cockroaches.

OTOH, it was a reasonable choice -- one of Zelazney's books that *is* set on earth, without a lot of special effects. As much as I'd like to see Lord of Light, I appreciate it could be tricky[2].

[1] Sensational: I guess bad emotions are technically sensational :)
[2] Blasphemous is often the word used. I'm not sure -- I interpreted it as having the fairly clear message that impersonating gods is bad, mmkay? but I can see others.

Date: 2005-09-02 01:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
The relevance of which is that I don't think the fx would be the hard bit.

LOL. I see what you mean. (Though I think my original point -- that Damn Alley is a reasonably unobjection film and hence was easier to make held mostly. I'm not sure if it was before or after starwars; now of course a scifi romp is a default film.)

Yes, I can so easily see the plot/characters etc of LoL being butchered. But it's always *possible* to do that well, even if people wouldn't want to :)