![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Harry Potter is part of Neal Stephenson's Baroque Cycle
* The philosopher's stone is a plot object in each, yet not presented as important as you'd think, by some sophistical hand-waving
* Both have plots fairly narritively satisfying to the extent you tend to not notice that logic is being torn assunder.
* Enoch Root adopted the guise of Nicholas Flamel, and later that of his "partner" Dumbledor. And once discovering alchemy/magic could be made to work practically and becoming headmaster and informal soul of it, continuing to meddle with everything both high and low, ignoring mundane conventions like laws in favour of assuring evil is defeated and knowledge is preserved.
* Harry is a Shaftoe, Hermione a Waterhouse. There's even a assonancey similarity.
* The philosopher's stone is a plot object in each, yet not presented as important as you'd think, by some sophistical hand-waving
* Both have plots fairly narritively satisfying to the extent you tend to not notice that logic is being torn assunder.
* Enoch Root adopted the guise of Nicholas Flamel, and later that of his "partner" Dumbledor. And once discovering alchemy/magic could be made to work practically and becoming headmaster and informal soul of it, continuing to meddle with everything both high and low, ignoring mundane conventions like laws in favour of assuring evil is defeated and knowledge is preserved.
* Harry is a Shaftoe, Hermione a Waterhouse. There's even a assonancey similarity.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 01:19 pm (UTC)I'm sure Stephenson would be horrified to have his work associated with JK Growling's.
If I had to be a Biblical character, I'd aim for Job...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 01:25 pm (UTC)I'm sure Stephenson would be horrified to have his work associated with JK Growling's.
That's why it's funny :) Though, I mean, he can't take himself *too* seriously: look at the langauge, for instance.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 01:37 pm (UTC)He hates smileys too.
I added you... hope you don't mind.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 01:57 pm (UTC)I reckon there are no Jesuses in Winnie the Pooh. Or... no. I can't think of any others.
> He hates smileys too.
Although, if you read to the bottom of the piece it turns out he really does like smileys. He denounces his earlier opinion with the reasoning: I wrote it in a snotty tone. Although sounds like he's happy with dumbing down if you ask me.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 02:02 pm (UTC)Damn him! As you can probably tell, I didn't read to the bottom of the article, having remembered from when I first read it that he was a smiley-hater, and didn't think he'd retract and renounce that. Bloomin' straight edgers, always letting you down...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 02:09 pm (UTC)Apart from the one character that:
* Dispenses wisdom and justice to the others
* Is consdiered the arbiter of morality and knowledge
* Departs for higher things at the end, but promises to return
* Has "Christ" in his name
:)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 02:40 pm (UTC)You know Tigger just appears, and is persecuted by Rabbit (or should I say Pontious Pilate?) Though I don't think that I can carry that any further...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 03:06 pm (UTC)The no-crucifiction thing is indeed the biggest problem :)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 03:43 pm (UTC)It's turtles all the way down!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 01:58 pm (UTC)To some extent. But there are some wonderful pasages (eg. Dappa and Peer) which are worthy of Three Men in a Boat, and quite a lot of it seems to be said with a wink.
But yes, I don't suppose he would really like being compared to JKR.
He hates smileys too.
Though seems to be less sure now?
I added you... hope you don't mind.
Of course not. *reciprocates*