jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
Harry Potter is part of Neal Stephenson's Baroque Cycle

* The philosopher's stone is a plot object in each, yet not presented as important as you'd think, by some sophistical hand-waving

* Both have plots fairly narritively satisfying to the extent you tend to not notice that logic is being torn assunder.

* Enoch Root adopted the guise of Nicholas Flamel, and later that of his "partner" Dumbledor. And once discovering alchemy/magic could be made to work practically and becoming headmaster and informal soul of it, continuing to meddle with everything both high and low, ignoring mundane conventions like laws in favour of assuring evil is defeated and knowledge is preserved.

* Harry is a Shaftoe, Hermione a Waterhouse. There's even a assonancey similarity.

Date: 2005-11-09 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Yes, God=CR was my first thought, but surely his *father* should take that role.

The no-crucifiction thing is indeed the biggest problem :)

Date: 2005-11-09 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minipoppy.livejournal.com
> surely his *father* should take that role

It's turtles all the way down!

Date: 2005-11-09 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
It could be worse. A (christian) friend once described God's behaviour as "dom" and then someone brought up the crucifiction...