Moral debate

[jack]

Hmm, there seems to be too much debate today. gerald_duck, robert_jones, filecoreinuse. And even extended argument about grammar and ice-cream with feanelwa and ewx not-respectively[1].

I guess I'm putting something off :)

In other news: I expected everyone to criticise my phases of the moon, but they didn't. I can never predict what will set people off ;)

[1] Would you distinguish "non-respectively" meaning "not necessarily in the order listed" and "not-respectively" meaning "not in the order listed?" Why didn't I just change the order? Because then I couldn't have this amusing footnote :)

Comments

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

It seemed likely to me richard would argue about anything :)

I went and looked up grice's maxims, and then saw the link from google had the already visited colour. Apparently I did that *before* and then forgot.

(And to you and filecoreinuse: yep, consensus seems to be formed that that would not be a useful or traditional distinction, however funny.)