More Goblet of Fire
Nov. 21st, 2005 10:43 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
jackI even did leave the review written for a couple of days in case I thought of something else, but only now did it occur to me.
* Tennant was great. I don't know if he can do a good guy, but I'll give Doctor Who a shot.
* I loved the Sirius-in-the-fire effect, though it was different to how I imagined it.
* I loved McGonnagal dancing.
And a couple of responses[1].
* Several people said they liked how Voldemort looked, but I still didn't.
* Did anyone else not read the book? I don't think anything in the film had necessary priors left out, but I would have thought there would be dangling things. Note, eviscerated isn't a critisicm necessarily, I know it was necessary. But things like Rita Skeeta might have been odd when she's just there, but never in the plot.
[1] LJ is not the medium for this.
* Tennant was great. I don't know if he can do a good guy, but I'll give Doctor Who a shot.
* I loved the Sirius-in-the-fire effect, though it was different to how I imagined it.
* I loved McGonnagal dancing.
And a couple of responses[1].
* Several people said they liked how Voldemort looked, but I still didn't.
* Did anyone else not read the book? I don't think anything in the film had necessary priors left out, but I would have thought there would be dangling things. Note, eviscerated isn't a critisicm necessarily, I know it was necessary. But things like Rita Skeeta might have been odd when she's just there, but never in the plot.
[1] LJ is not the medium for this.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 09:22 am (UTC)