That really wouldn't bother me. Would it bother you? You answered the literal question, not the question we all knew we all knew I meant, so I have no problem ignoring it.
If you'd suggested something plausible but horrendous (Something in the original something, something I'm nearly sure I wouldn't like, etc) I might have felt compelled to try.
But I don't have to play silly buggers, unless it's funny or [insert gay sex joke].
True. No, I wouldn't really delete any non-mass-spam comment: as speakers for the dead, I have a pathological belief in knowing more always being better :)
Re: Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 12:41 pm (UTC)Re: Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 12:49 pm (UTC)Re: Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 12:55 pm (UTC)If you'd suggested something plausible but horrendous (Something in the original something, something I'm nearly sure I wouldn't like, etc) I might have felt compelled to try.
But I don't have to play silly buggers, unless it's funny or [insert gay sex joke].
Re: Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 01:33 pm (UTC)Re: Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 01:37 pm (UTC)