(Maybe I should have excluded free books; all I regret about my relationship with Jane is she managed to dump on me what she described as the worst book ever written given away free with a woman's magazine :) )
LOL. Fair point. I could have done something else, though I think it's funnier to have some determinism. Part of the aim is to be rec'd something random.
Why do you not suggest something then? If I wouldn't have hated you for suggesting it first, I'll hopefully want to read it.
If On A Winter's Night A Traveller is a book about books: choosing and buying them, reading them, sharing them with others. But it's also a mystery: who actually wrote this book anyway? As the Reader in the book, a little way in you wonder whether it was actually written by Calvino at all or in fact by another author, and as you attempt to find the book you first wanted to read you twist and turn through ten pastiches of different novelistic forms. But since you have a companion on this journey, the Other Reader, the story is also a romance as your detective work brings you together on the textual trail through the book. It's a deeply odd volume, and great fun.
That really wouldn't bother me. Would it bother you? You answered the literal question, not the question we all knew we all knew I meant, so I have no problem ignoring it.
If you'd suggested something plausible but horrendous (Something in the original something, something I'm nearly sure I wouldn't like, etc) I might have felt compelled to try.
But I don't have to play silly buggers, unless it's funny or [insert gay sex joke].
True. No, I wouldn't really delete any non-mass-spam comment: as speakers for the dead, I have a pathological belief in knowing more always being better :)
As admittedly posted with LNR, The Time Traveller's Wife is fab... But a long term favourite, (and given that you're relatively geeky you've almost definitely read it already but hey) try The Sparrow (jesuits in spaaaaaaace) by Mary Doria Russell - one of the best novels in the world ever.
The Sparrow is terribly wonderful, it's scifi but essentially is about the nature of faith and humanity, I cried A LOT. Do grab it if you get a chance, or you could just borrow it from me, I also have the follow-up Children of God.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:18 pm (UTC)(Maybe I should have excluded free books; all I regret about my relationship with Jane is she managed to dump on me what she described as the worst book ever written given away free with a woman's magazine :) )
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 01:27 pm (UTC)Speaking of which, have tickets for the Annual Dinner gone on sale yet?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 01:29 pm (UTC)There should have been an email from naath with a menu asking for choices and cheques.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:20 pm (UTC)(S)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:31 pm (UTC)Why do you not suggest something then? If I wouldn't have hated you for suggesting it first, I'll hopefully want to read it.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:35 pm (UTC)(S)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:56 pm (UTC)(S)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 01:00 pm (UTC)Even though I am not first, I suggest you read Counting Heads by David Marusek, which is a very good near-future cloning/nanotech/AI story.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:47 pm (UTC)Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 12:36 pm (UTC)Re: Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 12:41 pm (UTC)Re: Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 12:49 pm (UTC)Re: Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 12:55 pm (UTC)If you'd suggested something plausible but horrendous (Something in the original something, something I'm nearly sure I wouldn't like, etc) I might have felt compelled to try.
But I don't have to play silly buggers, unless it's funny or [insert gay sex joke].
Re: Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 01:33 pm (UTC)Re: Aren't you lucky I didn't get in first?
Date: 2006-02-16 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-17 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-17 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-17 08:10 pm (UTC)