jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
Recently I saw discussions on AI, and the possibilities of representing its knowledge by assinging % confidences (subjective probabilities) to statements, and the problems where a belief in one part of the brain didn't match that in another. I've read a lot around the topic, and Hempel's paradox, and Bayesian reasoning, and upper-and-lower probabilities, and may follow up with some contentful posts, but I experienced that cognitive dissonance today, and thought I'd record it.

Me: Ooh, there's another Cat wizard book by Diane Duane. It's being partially published online, it's really interesting to see professional authors continuing to investigate that. And she says "beta readers".
Me: Hold on, *have* I read the first one?
Me: I ordered it from amazon marketplace, I was excited about that.
Me: The books arrived.
Me: I've read all of them but [other name] and [other other name].
Me: So why don't I remember it?
Me: Checks autoconfirm email. Paid for.
Me: Doh! Goes to write previous post. Emails amazon. Checks bank statement and sees refund.
Me: Hmmm. Apparently that chain of 95% certainties was weaker than all the links, and something fell into the 1-0.95^n gap. "The" books arrived, I didn't stop to think if that was "every" book...
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Active Recent Entries