Epistemology #0
Mar. 23rd, 2006 06:57 pmRecently I saw discussions on AI, and the possibilities of representing its knowledge by assinging % confidences (subjective probabilities) to statements, and the problems where a belief in one part of the brain didn't match that in another. I've read a lot around the topic, and Hempel's paradox, and Bayesian reasoning, and upper-and-lower probabilities, and may follow up with some contentful posts, but I experienced that cognitive dissonance today, and thought I'd record it.
Me: Ooh, there's another Cat wizard book by Diane Duane. It's being partially published online, it's really interesting to see professional authors continuing to investigate that. And she says "beta readers".
Me: Hold on, *have* I read the first one?
Me: I ordered it from amazon marketplace, I was excited about that.
Me: The books arrived.
Me: I've read all of them but [other name] and [other other name].
Me: So why don't I remember it?
Me: Checks autoconfirm email. Paid for.
Me: Doh! Goes to write previous post. Emails amazon. Checks bank statement and sees refund.
Me: Hmmm. Apparently that chain of 95% certainties was weaker than all the links, and something fell into the 1-0.95^n gap. "The" books arrived, I didn't stop to think if that was "every" book...
Me: Ooh, there's another Cat wizard book by Diane Duane. It's being partially published online, it's really interesting to see professional authors continuing to investigate that. And she says "beta readers".
Me: Hold on, *have* I read the first one?
Me: I ordered it from amazon marketplace, I was excited about that.
Me: The books arrived.
Me: I've read all of them but [other name] and [other other name].
Me: So why don't I remember it?
Me: Checks autoconfirm email. Paid for.
Me: Doh! Goes to write previous post. Emails amazon. Checks bank statement and sees refund.
Me: Hmmm. Apparently that chain of 95% certainties was weaker than all the links, and something fell into the 1-0.95^n gap. "The" books arrived, I didn't stop to think if that was "every" book...
no subject
Date: 2006-03-23 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-23 10:30 pm (UTC)...Ron's a fan, too. In fact, it's what makes him as good a SF producer as he is. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-23 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 11:27 am (UTC)Some people see a sharp division between eg. amateur writing and professional writing, whereas it seems more like a continuum.
PS. Everyone is always welcome in my journal (especially you! :)) but I'm always curious -- how did you come across this post? :)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-27 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 12:00 am (UTC)Of course, that makes sense. And I see my link rather stands out as being the only one using The Big Meow as an example of epistomology :)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-30 12:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-23 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-24 11:23 am (UTC)