S&M Wedding

May. 7th, 2006 12:44 am
jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
That was a lovely day, though not really lending itself to blogging. Weddings and ceilidh are great, I'm really tired and will likely spend tomorrow relaxing. Here's to Sally and Matthew!

Date: 2006-05-07 07:43 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] rjw76
To Sally and Matthew!

...also, I wondered what you were on about on reading "S&M Wedding", which I'm sure was deliberate :P

Date: 2006-05-07 12:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
S&M Wedding

*rofl* I wish I'd thought of that!

Date: 2006-05-07 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] rjw76
My cousin Susie and her husband Mark thought of it, neatly sidestepped all the jokes, and handed out wedding favours with Skittles and M&Ms in. With S and M on the sweets, obviously :)

Date: 2006-05-07 03:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
Aw, I like the sound of that - so sweet!

Date: 2006-05-07 09:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Pun intended?

Date: 2006-05-07 10:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Someone had written "To M and S" instead of S&M[1] which just avoided the thing so easily. My brain should have worked that one out at some point... :)

There should be a verb, to S&M-wed someone :)

[1] Why *do* they always come in that order? Does it sound better? Does it represent some sort of sequence in a philosophical journey? Is it just to avoid confusion with Marks & Sparks?

Date: 2006-05-08 08:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
Of course - any pun is a good pun ;)

Date: 2006-05-08 08:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
[1] Well, sado-masochism is easier to compound than the other way round, so I guess the initilialisation reflects that or something :) Though I like the sequence in a philosophical journey argument ;)

Date: 2006-05-08 09:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
What about "maso-sadism"? Why would that be harder?

I felt I should include the philosophical journey. Though I'm not at all sure any tendancy to move would be in that direction.