jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
I have some (but not 10) new levels for my winnie-the-pooh flash game, and have gone back to experimenting with live action animation. Hopefully real people for CR and girlfriend, and (creepily) soft toys for the venemous animal characters.

The question is, if I manipulate pooh teddybear with needles to hold his limbs in various running positions for stop-motion photography, is that evil?

Is that why people believe cameras steal their souls, they just haven't broken the fourth wall enough?

Date: 2006-11-20 08:53 pm (UTC)
mair_in_grenderich: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mair_in_grenderich
yes, yes, it's evil.

oh, have some feedback ...

Date: 2006-11-21 01:52 pm (UTC)
mair_in_grenderich: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mair_in_grenderich
I have yet to combine "browser with flash installed" and "ooh, I should try that Pooh game sometime"[1], but someone clicked through my LJ to you and ate an hour of their day (or night) :)


23:58 <sladen> cartesiandaemon's pooh game is evil
23:58 <sladen> it's mostly completeable, but level 11 always ends up with at least 1 ladybird left
23:58 <flurble> it's flash, isn't it? I haven't tried it
23:59 <sladen> it sucked an hour of my time
23:59 <flurble> :D :D

[1] I am also scared by the mentions of violent pooh