(no subject)
Mar. 5th, 2008 11:19 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Good job ✓
Good friends ✓
Relationship with subheadingy and beautiful woman ✓
Life ✓
Chorus: Yay!
Going abroad on holiday was one of the fun things I wanted to do this year (or, to be fair, last year), and I'm pleased I have: for several years I've never got round to it, having so much excuse to spend time with people nearby.
Chorus: Aw!
But the reason I was in Stockholm specifically was to see
livredor as a delayed Cyril and Methodius[1] weekend. We really met at my and her Christmas parties, and had a date at New Year when she was in the country, and exchanged email spiralling out of all control, and are now officially going out.
Chorus: Squee!
[1] Apparently the correct honorific for "Saints" is "Sts." But is that right? Shouldn't it be "St.s"? But that looks completely wrong :)
Chorus: Wuh?
It was obviously a calculated risk visiting someone in an unformed relationship; it could indeed have been awkward if we had felt pressure to get on. But we decided we were objectively optimistic, given how well we hugged both on our coffee date, and electronically, indeed, we were as comfortable hugging in real life.
Chorus: Squee!
So we had a lovely weekend and debating, snuggling and Stockholm, and I don't really have anything more to say in this paragraph, I just wanted to mention again that we officially examined the common relationship paradigms available to us in this culture and decided that "relationship" and "going out" best cover what we agreed we were going.
Chorus: SQUEE!
Chorus: But do we get a link?
Of course. Her post: here
Good friends ✓
Relationship with subheadingy and beautiful woman ✓
Life ✓
Chorus: Yay!
Going abroad on holiday was one of the fun things I wanted to do this year (or, to be fair, last year), and I'm pleased I have: for several years I've never got round to it, having so much excuse to spend time with people nearby.
Chorus: Aw!
But the reason I was in Stockholm specifically was to see
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Chorus: Squee!
[1] Apparently the correct honorific for "Saints" is "Sts." But is that right? Shouldn't it be "St.s"? But that looks completely wrong :)
Chorus: Wuh?
It was obviously a calculated risk visiting someone in an unformed relationship; it could indeed have been awkward if we had felt pressure to get on. But we decided we were objectively optimistic, given how well we hugged both on our coffee date, and electronically, indeed, we were as comfortable hugging in real life.
Chorus: Squee!
So we had a lovely weekend and debating, snuggling and Stockholm, and I don't really have anything more to say in this paragraph, I just wanted to mention again that we officially examined the common relationship paradigms available to us in this culture and decided that "relationship" and "going out" best cover what we agreed we were going.
Chorus: SQUEE!
Chorus: But do we get a link?
Of course. Her post: here
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 08:50 pm (UTC)(But look at the shiny relationship! Pay attention to the shiny! :))
no subject
Date: 2008-03-08 11:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-09 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 01:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 08:53 pm (UTC)(I assume you mean 'back from Sweden', not 'back from being single' or 'back from thinking about flights' :))
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 08:54 pm (UTC)And thanks, that makes sense. Although it sounds like a really cool name for a ship. Google turned up 'Sts.' top, that's why I guessed that.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-08 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-08 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 01:45 pm (UTC)I am a friend of Livredor's and happy to hear you guys are an item!
All the best of luck and love!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 01:55 pm (UTC)Footnote in the middle of a page: ✓
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 03:11 pm (UTC)(Although,
<geek subjects="Tron,polyhedra">
it's listed in your icon list under the title "Bit - no", but the yellow octahedron is the shape the Bit assumes when it says Yes! The No shape is a dark red very spiky stellation of the icosahedron.</geek>
)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 10:27 pm (UTC)I was aware of this error, but I haven't corrected it as AFAIK doing so will change all the previous usages of it to my default image. I didn't think anyone would actually check what it was listed under :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 02:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 03:38 pm (UTC)Also, am I the only one confused by "subheadingy"? In what way is she like a subheading?
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-06 09:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-06 11:44 am (UTC)But I was half serious, because I bet a lot of people who don't follow the journal closely didn't know that the Christmas squee had actually gone anywhere, if they missed the passing mention of the *reason* for the Stockholm visit :)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 08:43 pm (UTC)I would normally use "SS" for "Saints". Could be the Catholic influence.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-05 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-06 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-06 11:54 am (UTC)