jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
Good job ✓
Good friends ✓
Relationship with subheadingy and beautiful woman ✓
Life ✓

Chorus: Yay!

Going abroad on holiday was one of the fun things I wanted to do this year (or, to be fair, last year), and I'm pleased I have: for several years I've never got round to it, having so much excuse to spend time with people nearby.

Chorus: Aw!

But the reason I was in Stockholm specifically was to see [livejournal.com profile] livredor as a delayed Cyril and Methodius[1] weekend. We really met at my and her Christmas parties, and had a date at New Year when she was in the country, and exchanged email spiralling out of all control, and are now officially going out.

Chorus: Squee!

[1] Apparently the correct honorific for "Saints" is "Sts." But is that right? Shouldn't it be "St.s"? But that looks completely wrong :)

Chorus: Wuh?

It was obviously a calculated risk visiting someone in an unformed relationship; it could indeed have been awkward if we had felt pressure to get on. But we decided we were objectively optimistic, given how well we hugged both on our coffee date, and electronically, indeed, we were as comfortable hugging in real life.

Chorus: Squee!

So we had a lovely weekend and debating, snuggling and Stockholm, and I don't really have anything more to say in this paragraph, I just wanted to mention again that we officially examined the common relationship paradigms available to us in this culture and decided that "relationship" and "going out" best cover what we agreed we were going.

Chorus: SQUEE!

Chorus: But do we get a link?

Of course. Her post: here

Date: 2008-03-05 11:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
In retrospect, that would have been a relevant thing to tell people on my postcards, when I was wondering what I could write beyond "Sweden yay! I sent you a postcard!". I completely forgot, (a) forgetting that people wouldn't have known the gossip by Monday, even though it felt very natural by then and (b) knowing that I don't know anyone who would read my postcard before my livejournal.

Date: 2008-03-05 12:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hilarityallen.livejournal.com
Ss is a perfectly acceptable abbreviation for saints.

Date: 2008-03-05 01:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriammoules.livejournal.com
you beat me to it!

Date: 2008-03-05 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Thank you.

(But look at the shiny relationship! Pay attention to the shiny! :))

Date: 2008-03-08 11:13 am (UTC)
liv: cartoon of me with long plait, teapot and purple outfit (Default)
From: [personal profile] liv
I very much love that your friends respond to the news of a new relationship by debating what is the correct title for more than one saint. *bounce*

Date: 2008-03-05 01:08 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
abbreviate(plural("Saint")) = "Sts." makes perfect sense to me (accepting that there might be other widely accepted abbreviations of it as above). plural(abbreviate("Saint")) seems like an odd way to go about it.

Date: 2008-03-05 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Thanks! It's all good.

(I assume you mean 'back from Sweden', not 'back from being single' or 'back from thinking about flights' :))

Date: 2008-03-05 09:44 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Yes, back from Sweden. I'd not modeled singleness in a place-like way but I had noticed that you'd been rather occupied with thinking about flying l-)

Date: 2008-03-05 08:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
That makes sense. It feels wrong to leave out the middle and put a "." at the end, but that is normal practice, I now recall. But it seems less precise than applying the plural and abbrev functions in a strict order :)

Date: 2008-03-05 01:35 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-03-05 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] midnightmelody.livejournal.com
The honorific as used in Catholic-everything is 'Ss.', as in Ss. Cyril and Methodius. (Wandered over from [livejournal.com profile] livredor's post, and saw my favourite festival mentioned and spelling-pedantry all combined.)

Date: 2008-03-05 08:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Hi!

And thanks, that makes sense. Although it sounds like a really cool name for a ship. Google turned up 'Sts.' top, that's why I guessed that.

Date: 2008-03-08 11:15 am (UTC)
liv: cartoon of me with long plait, teapot and purple outfit (Default)
From: [personal profile] liv
Yay. I am glad LJ makes it possible to connect you and [livejournal.com profile] cartesiandaemon, because you are indeed the person who brought the idea of Cyril and Methodius into my awareness. And therefore made it possible for a Jew and an atheist to have a long, convoluted discussion about exactly which saint's day we should be celebrating.

Date: 2008-03-08 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] midnightmelody.livejournal.com
Gosh, that is very gratifying! I figure that all people who have thought about religion at all ought to celebrate two saints who made it easier for people to access theological ideas. Personally, I try to spend at least two hours in a bookshop every 14th Feb. :)

Date: 2008-03-05 01:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rav-hadassah.livejournal.com
Hi,

I am a friend of Livredor's and happy to hear you guys are an item!

All the best of luck and love!

Date: 2008-03-05 11:24 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-03-05 01:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com
Unicode: ✓

Footnote in the middle of a page: ✓

Date: 2008-03-05 03:11 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
icon++ :-)

(Although, <geek subjects="Tron,polyhedra"> it's listed in your icon list under the title "Bit - no", but the yellow octahedron is the shape the Bit assumes when it says Yes! The No shape is a dark red very spiky stellation of the icosahedron. </geek> )

Date: 2008-03-05 10:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robhu.livejournal.com
:-)

I was aware of this error, but I haven't corrected it as AFAIK doing so will change all the previous usages of it to my default image. I didn't think anyone would actually check what it was listed under :-)

Date: 2008-03-05 11:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
ROFL. Indeed, lovely icon. An indeterminate fix would be to add a comment to the description saying so, although admittedly that would draw the attention of people who didn't know.

Date: 2008-03-05 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] despotliz.livejournal.com
Hooray for everything mentioned above. I can already see that [Unknown site tag] must be great because we have a startling number of mutual lj friends, proving once again that either a) the geek world is too small or b) I know too many people.

Date: 2008-03-05 02:15 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-03-05 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alextfish.livejournal.com
Awesome and congratulations!

Also, am I the only one confused by "subheadingy"? In what way is she like a subheading?

Date: 2008-03-05 05:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ilanin.livejournal.com
I considered remarking that I was pretty certain I wouldn't date somebody who wasn't offended by being called subheadingy but that this shouldn't stop anybody else.

Date: 2008-03-05 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
It is true, it is imprecise, she is not like a subheading, but predisposed to use subheadings. (Actually not, but that's what it means.) That should probably go in the FAQ, hold on... :)

Date: 2008-03-05 05:01 pm (UTC)
ext_29671: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ravingglory.livejournal.com
Yay! (not that is news is in anyway unexpected)

Date: 2008-03-05 08:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
:) Indeed. For the benefit of people who either didn't notice the relationship postings in the welter of others, haven't been recommending me books, or didn't expect the trip to go well, here it is :)

Date: 2008-03-06 09:19 am (UTC)
ext_29671: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ravingglory.livejournal.com
Ok, you are right, just because I expected didn't mean other people on your flist didn't. Anyways I like hearing the new officially.

Date: 2008-03-06 11:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Oh, I wasn't very serious. I mean, I mainly just wanted to make it all official, and post a lot of FAQ :) Anyone who knows the situation well probably did know how it would turn out (we did) :)

But I was half serious, because I bet a lot of people who don't follow the journal closely didn't know that the Christmas squee had actually gone anywhere, if they missed the passing mention of the *reason* for the Stockholm visit :)

Date: 2008-03-05 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ceb.livejournal.com
Aww, congratulations :-)

Date: 2008-03-05 09:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
*hugs* Thank you.

Date: 2008-03-05 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-next.livejournal.com
Squee indeed! :-)

I would normally use "SS" for "Saints". Could be the Catholic influence.

Date: 2008-03-05 09:00 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-03-06 02:03 am (UTC)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
From: [personal profile] redbird
Hello, new sweetie of my friend [livejournal.com profile] livredor. Her friendship and mine has been mostly online (there's this ocean in the way), but I have gotten to show her little bits of my city.

Date: 2008-03-06 11:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
:) *hugs* Thank you. (I like "New sweetie" more than other things we've been called :))

Active Recent Entries