On good friday I, too[1], went to meet my parents

[jack]

Tomorrow is a bank holiday, isn't it?

After ascerning that it definitely was easter tomorrow, and very nearly but not quite getting my program to compile in every configeration, mum and dad picked me up from work.

Ambiguity had been kept *mostly* as decent as it had been made the last parent-visit :) and I'd done the last of the washing-up and a bit of vaccuuming the night before, so it was acceptable. I made dinner mainly from frozen components, which was quite nice though, and I think it impressed mum that I'd settled in enough that I could produce dinner for everyone without any faff. It also reminded me of two beliefs: (1) that food looks more professional if it comes in half a dozen different portions on the plate instead of a big mix and (2) any room looks tidier if you empty and clean any table and put it in the middle

Like Mornington Crescent would be, if it wasn't Mornington Crescent

Then Dad and I went to the Golden Hind and played pool. He won, but I *am* getting slowly better :) And while we were waiting for the table, and discussing money-putting-down etiquette[2]. And while we were waiting we played beggar-my-neighbour[3] and had much fun pretending it to be a game with skill, saying things like "Aha! Little did you know I was saving a jack in reserve" and "Oh no! I didn't see that coming at all!"

In fact, it was quite like mornington crescent. Which reminds me of *last* saturday, which I completely failed to spod, when we played 'London' at Owen's belated housewarming, which really is best described as "Like mornington crescent, but not" because it is a game which REALLY IS about moving dice-thrown numbers along underground tracks, trying to get to six designated stations. There was also a mao-like game, except that the new rules were predetermined of the form of 'play n cards per round' and the like.

[1] Sorry for the blasphemous joke. I couldn't resist.
[2] I described my observations as "Anyone can put the price of a game on the edge of the table and they play in that order. Whether they play a person of their choice or the previous winner is implementation defined. How many games you can by at once is undefined."[4] Does that sound accurate?
[3] Half the pack each. Always play from the top of your pile. Play alternately. But when a J,Q,K or A appears the other player plays 1,2,3 or 4 cards and you collect the whole discard pile, unless one of those cards is itself a J,Q,K or A in which case it the first player has to play 1,2..etc.
[4] Except I didn't say it in those words because I was talking to dad who isn't a C programmer. But I translated it for geekblogging :)

Comments

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

Who won?

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

Rachel :)

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

:) Go girlfriend!

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

She probably wouldn't like me calling her that, huh?

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

LOL. I was about to say, you might be taking this endearment thing too far. I guess you'd have a nice making-fun-of-tim rapport instantly, so you might get away with it :)

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

Nah. No fun to pick on people I didn't know.

BTW, apparently Drew ROFL when I mentioned that my male friends didn't like copious quantities of endearments. He thought it really sad that you're not all 'man enough' to take it.

The concept of culture differences seems to have totally passed him by.

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

!! Did you tell him *which* endearments you were using? :)

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

This was still at the 'honey' and 'sweetie' stage :)

I don't think you're less of a man. I think it's all just macho posturing. *puts on mid-West accent* "Come sit on my knee, ma'am, and call me sugar-puff"

Ok, that was pretty lame, but you know what I mean

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

Ah, yes, I think I see. Though some of it is the *way* you say sweetie :)

Though I'm still a bit confused by the whole middle paragraph :)

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

Ah, yes, I think I see. Though some of it is the *way* you say sweetie :)

OK, now I'm genuinely confused. How do I say it that makes it weird/irritating?

Though I'm still a bit confused by the whole middle paragraph :)

Oh, that. I don't know, I get the impression he's trying to prove how much of a man he is by mocking my friends. Which is irritating.

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

OK, now I'm genuinely confused. How do I say it that makes it weird/irritating?

A lot! :)

No, sorry. I didn't mean you specifically, I meant that one can say 'honey' in different ways: as a casual friendly name the way people use 'pet' in brum and up north; as an endearment some people would find sweet and some sickening; to tease friends because they don't; etc.

Oh, that. I don't know, I get the impression he's trying to prove how much of a man he is by mocking my friends. Which is irritating.

And weird. I guess it's that he's more mature than me, because I get irrationally anoyed by 'snookie' and he doesn't :) But still odd.

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

And weird. I guess it's that he's more mature than me, because I get irrationally anoyed by 'snookie' and he doesn't :) But still odd.

Yeah, he's winding me up a bit. I think his time as my beta's come to and end.

Don't sell yourself short: you're the only snookiedums for me.

(Ok, we need to change topic soon, because that term is really beginning to lose its impact)

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

Aww, thanks you. Never have I been less annoyed to be called snookiedums :) But it's ok; I was mainly meaning that's what he meant. What I think my opinion of snookiedums says about my maturity I don't venture an opinion on :)

(Ok, we need to change topic soon, because that term is really beginning to lose its impact)

We could talk about honey. Or cutesypie. Or darling. Or dahling. Or bablicious :)

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

I like cutesypie, hate darling/dahling. Bablicious needs to have an extra 'e', or it sounds too much like 'babbilicious', which I also like :)

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

You also like? Does that mean you do like 'babelicious'? :)

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

Yes, smoochikins, I adore it :)

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

OK, I'll use it at every opportunity, Dumpling :)

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

DUMPLING???

That's what my parents call me when they're trying to persuade me to go on a diet! Not loving it, sadly

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

This is a pretty weird competition to be having, huh?

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

There was a marvellous bit in one of the Neal Stephenson books where Dappa (freed slave) remarked to Daniel (mathmo protaganist) that they were having a strange conversation, and he replied that it rated barely 2 or 3 on his scale, (from 1=normal to 10=weirdest ever) where he often had two conversations rating 6 or 7 in a day, and Charles (bigoted dandy journalist) came up and began to explain how this related to politics to Dappa, but he kept assuming Dappa couldn't think, and was just well trained (eg. "I speak 15 languages" "Wow! Your old master must have been exceptionally erudite!"), and began to explain England resisting France by analogy to two baboons fighting for dominance, and Daniel described journalism as them flinging faeces at each other, but in such a way as Charles didn't see the insult, and eventually Charles asked Dappa leading questions about Eliza (female lead) and Dappa said he didn't think he should fling faeces at her; and when Charles left, Daniel said "Before you ask, that was a 10."

I feel like that a lot of the time. Dave Hodge scores a +3 bonus to any conversation, and CUWOCS doesn't hurt either :)

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

That sounds fun actually :) I really must check him out again one of these days

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

Babblicious is great, though.

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

I don't mind that one :)

[cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com]

It could be construed as implying an insult... :)

[nakedtoes.livejournal.com]

Hell, I know I babble :)