jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
If you saw a mainstream link to "How to write like Dan Brown" would you expect it was sarcasm, or serious?

Date: 2013-05-08 05:17 pm (UTC)
onyxlynx: The words "Onyx" and "Lynx" with x superimposed (Default)
From: [personal profile] onyxlynx
Satire.

Date: 2013-05-08 05:28 pm (UTC)
gerald_duck: (by Redderz)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
Depends how high-brow a publication.

In tabloid media, serious. In places I'm likely to see a link, satire.

On BBC News… hmm… could go either way. (-8

Date: 2013-05-08 06:28 pm (UTC)
fluffymormegil: @ (Default)
From: [personal profile] fluffymormegil
I would want it to be satire/sarcasm; in a mainstream source I might well expect it to be devoid of those traits.

Date: 2013-05-08 06:41 pm (UTC)
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)
From: [personal profile] azurelunatic
This.

Date: 2013-05-09 10:21 am (UTC)
pseudomonas: per bend sinister azure and or a chameleon counterchanged (Default)
From: [personal profile] pseudomonas
Mainstream, I'd expect it was serious, if it wasn't provided with other contextual hints that it was satire. While Dan Brown is not generally seen as a Great Writer, I don't think he's (in mainstream terms) the figure of fun that would be required for there to be much mileage in a satirical link with that title. He's a byword for "successful low-brow" rather than "awful writing style", though possibly people see "writing like Dan Brown" as an attainable target compared to other successful writers.