jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
Dear Science Fiction Author,

I love humorously circuitous circumlocutions as much as the next Three Musketeers fan, but even I have to admit that "increased the rate of those incidents by a power of two" could more easily be written as "doubled". (Or if you mean, by a higher power of two, or if you mean "squared", then I think you're using numbers wrong.)

Love Cartesian Daemon

Date: 2013-09-03 09:43 pm (UTC)
gerald_duck: (Oh really?)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
I'm not sure two is the automatic choice of power of two. Why not, say, 1.000000001? That's a power of two as well, albeit not an integer power.

Moreover, is there anything other than a lack of units to suggest they meant "increased... by a factor of a power of two" rather than by an absolute amount that's a factor of two? :-p

Date: 2013-09-04 12:19 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
Taken completely literally, "increased by a power of two" doesn't even sound multiplicative – it suggests to me that if there were A incidents last year and B incidents this year, then they are claiming that B = A + 2n for some n.

I think surely they just wrote 'power' when they meant to write 'factor', probably because 'power of two' is a common phrase in other contexts and the wrong neuron fired.