jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
I used to tag posts about LJ "meta", but I had no way to tag posts which were about "meta" itself. I could have used "meta-meta", but then, well, that enters an infinite recursion of paradox...

In what ways are facebook more attractive than DW/LJ? Either better or more addictive. I agree with all the reasons facebook is bad (that it hides what you want to see in favour of things that will get more advertising, that they obscure the privacy model, that they inconsistently enforce real names policy and let abusive things pass but ban anything vaguely detrimental to advertisers, etc) And why many of us like LJ,DW, because I love long-form posts. But I suspect that I end up using it because it's convenient in some ways, not *just* because of the network effect.

Off the top of my head:

* Easy to do many things
* Easy to "share" other people's statuses
* Easy to post short updates and have *some* (albeit bad) comment threads on them
* Easy to post albums of pictures
* Easy to see weddings, births, etc from distant friends
* That simply everyone is on there

What else?

Date: 2014-09-27 07:44 am (UTC)
danohu: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danohu
and one more...

go to facebook.com logged-out. Half the page is taken up by a very clear, simple sign-up form.

go to LJ or DW logged out. You have to really hunt around to figure out how to join the thing.

Again, this is an outcome of a bigger gap in the development resources. It's actually making me wonder if we should just all pile into dreamwidth development, and start improving things like this.