OK. Strictly speaking, they were talking about things of-more-than-one-child and said something which sounded like "childs". I took it as an error of pluralisation, but I guess it could alternatively have been an error of number. It certainly wasn't correct!
Oh, sorry, got you, I assumed "child's" might be grammatical but of course it isn't. I go sort of plural-blind looking at "children" it has nearly three plural suffices already and I forgot they weren't all already there in this case :)
no subject
Date: 2015-02-18 12:04 am (UTC)Stupid question, how could you tell if it was "child's" or "childs'"?
no subject
Date: 2015-02-18 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-02-18 06:30 pm (UTC)