jack: (Default)
[personal profile] jack
My name is and:
I read livejournal, even if I rarely post.
I remember what 142 is without calculating it.
Wow, you've been busy this week.
You should stop messing with your own polls and use LJ.
You should stop messing with LJ and write your own blogging system.
My great-aunt wrote blogging software, you insensitive bastard!

ETA: Oh. That last textbox was supposed to read "*****" but it didn't work.

Date: 2006-04-27 12:40 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I'm not sure why it feels more natural to be able to remember 132 than 142 but it does. 17 is the first non-negative integer I can't do from memory and of course the first you can't do from memory is easier than others to calculate.
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
It doesn't to me. I learned 1-10 times tables very early, and I think picked up 11 and 12 squared then, though the eleven and twelve table never stuck, (though I remember some now.)

A little later I learnt the squares up to 20 iirc. 132 and 142 I remembered because they're anagrams. 152 I remember because 5s tend to become 2s and 5s and I just remember that value. 162 for obvious reasons. And all those come up occasionally.

After that, I'm the same as you, 17+ I dont' remember, and probably never will unless I make a specific effort to do so.

I don't know why I picked 14 rather than 13 as the question. It just felt more elegant somehow. Also, that people who know 122 might easily have seen 132 out of the corner of their eye, 142 more for its own sake :)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
The anagram thing does make it easier. I think for some reason I've just had more call to know 132 over the years.
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
LOL. It's fairly useless knowledge, but I'm glad to spread it :)

I wonder if 13 *does* come up more. I have the feeling I've used both about the same amount occasionally, but I'm not sure.