jack: (Default)
This came up at the emergency party at the weekend (although I can't remember why now, I think we were talking about why we like Indiana Jones). Casey and Andy comic [1] had one strip where they rated how nerdy various answers to questions was, one being "Name a fictional archaeologist". It was a good concept, although I (and I think others) disagreed with the answers somewhat.

Fortunately we realised the *real* nerd response was to immediately critique the test and start listing fictional archaeologists in order of how nerdy they are to think of first.

1. Indiana Jones. This was given as the normal response, least nerdy. After all, Indiana Jones is a mainstream classic. However, most of the geeks I know agree with that.

2. Lara Croft. This was given as a geekier response, which is probably true. Although most geeks I know think Lara Croft is a bit passe :)

3. Daniel Jackson from stargate. More obscure, and he actually is geeky himself.

4. Henry Jones, Sr. Slightly more specific than Indian.

5. Henry Jones, Jr. Strictly more geeky than "Indiana", as it requires a detailed knowledge of the series.

6. Someone from a good space-opera I hadn't read.

7. The senior Dalrymple, Earl of Scarborough, from Pippa's work in progress, it being even geekier to *write* about a momentous discovery of linguistics/archaeology.

8. Some other fictionalised *actual* archaeologist.

9. Pham Nuwen, from Vernor Vinge's Fire Upon the Deep and Deepness in the Sky, a software archaeologist. I was very proud of this one, I thought it wins.

But does anyone have a 10?

[1] although this strip on a similar theme is a lot more epic.
jack: (Default)
Holy flarking shit, it's cold outside. There may or may not have been any kind of atmosphere, I didn't stop to see.

Pedant note: Yes, this is more than one line, but only because of the pedant note.

Pedant note: In actual fact, there was atmosphere (defined as gravitationally bound gas, including approx 20% ox, 80% inert), as I can deduce from a variety of retrospective clues, such as the absence of exploding eyeballs, etc. This is a rhetorical technique, exaggerating an effect to create a feeling of, as well as knowledge of, its significance.

Many rhetorical techniques use counter-factual, or perhaps a-factual statements, but can be described as "not wrong" because although they convey less literal truth, they often convey more of an underlying, more relevant truth.

Pedant note: This was last night. This morning it was quite nice, and right now I don't know, because I'm inside.
jack: (Default)
Tojan horses

Linked from Raymond Chen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs3SfNANtig

What happens if you build a wooden horse, put some soldiers inside it, and then ask security guards if you can leave it overnight inside their complex? Mostly, nothing. The Turkish consulate refused though.

Choice quotes (With no prompting) "Why would there be anyone inside?" and later "I had no idea those soldiers were in there!"

Isn't it amazing what you find on wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_computer_and_video_games_considered_the_worst_ever

I mean, isn't that useful? It is exactly the sort of thing you might want to know. I think I found it when someone joking about a notoriously bad game and I wanted to know why, or possibly when I wanted to joke about a notoriously bad game and had to look one up to be the butt :)

50 worst named computer games of all time

http://www.gamerevolution.com/feature/worst_names

I feel sorry for them, but it can be funny.

"Zeitgeist (Playstation/PC, 1998)

Man, nothing says 'fun' like a German philosophical term for an era in the dialectical progression of a people or the world at large."

Intermediate Value Theorem in "Down to earth practical utility" shocker!

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200512/s1524163.htm

On a smooth but not flat surface you can theoretically rotate a four-legged table so it doesn't wobble (but mayn't be flat). Doesn't knowing that your irritating failure is mathematically impossible make you feel a warm glow inside? Go maths!
jack: (Default)
On Friday I was cycling up the top of Campkin road, and passing the "road narrowed" zebra crossing, when I found a white van heading straight for me. Fortunately, we could both stop, and I squeezed off onto the pavement and all was fine.

The thing is, me being obviously in the wrong, would have been very annoying. Him been obviously in the wrong, would also have been very annoying. But as he passed, he called out of the window. It was either "My god, I'm sorry, mate!" or "Can't you fucking read, mate?" but I can't tell which, and being left not knowing whether to be sympathetic or angry with him was VERY VERY annoying.

(Give way markings and a sign saying "give way to oncoming traffic" in that direction, and not in this direction, incline me to the view that he should have stopped.)
jack: (Default)
Just before may week, numberland (who is cuddly) stopped over at the weekend, and introduced me to some anime, and helped me resort my books.

My bookshelves had got a bit out of sync. We went through them, and all the boxes in the spare room, working out what should be *out*.

There's no complete system any more, "out" translates to a mix of: favourites to recommend, recent favourites to reread, old acquisitions I'd like to see again or never read, new books.

Do you sort books qualitatively?

Unfortunately, it looses the "This is the bookshelf I recommend" thing. It was good to have it, but it doesn't quite work because (a) new and reread books go on there so it gets mixed up (b) many authors are kept together, so series move on and off as a unit and (c) it's hard to fairly compare recent acquisitions with old classics.

I could keep separate them into "great" and "others", but I know they'd get muddled up.
jack: (Default)
A friend's girlfriend saw me in the street wearing a suit, and their comment was "It says something about you that our best guess was that you were doing office-themed LARP, rather than going to a job interview or something."

In fact, I was going to BA dinner with college daughter and college niece.

FWIW, most people I know do very much tend to jeans and black T-shirts sort of clothes. I hypothesise that we generally value time above appearance, and also have a streak of non-conformance. And I hypothesise that that makes dressing up for social events and special occasions more attractive.

In fact, due to equally proportioned blame confusion, we were going to BA dinner the *next* night, and so I joined them and Is-and-her-James (all their boyfriends are called James, it's just one of those things) for Pizza Express.

But it's quite nice wearing a suit out. It looks good and is comfortable. I would more often, except for the aforementioned lack of desire to get smart clothes cleaned and ironed regularly, and the fact that ironing shirts better might pass unnoticed (and be definitely a good thing), wearing a suit casually would produce nothing but remarks :)

I still find excuses to wear suits on dates sometimes :)

Cloak!

Jul. 3rd, 2007 02:56 pm
jack: (Default)
And, of course, the veizla gave me another time to wear my cloak! It is blue and silver-lined and shiny and feels nice and swirls, and goes well with a period shirt. Thanks, Rosy *hugs* :)

Swimmingly

Jun. 25th, 2007 01:24 pm
jack: (Default)
I went swimming at Jesus Green yesterday and it was great.

I just did 13 lengths of Jesus Green, but felt quite cleansed after. My legs felt weak afterwards, and my arms ached a touch this morning, from which I judge it to have been actually a decent workout, and yet easy to *do*, not in constant pain like trying to go jogging :)

I hadn't been swimming for years[1], not since I was at school. Dad and I used to swim quite a lot (often and far, in fact, I was briefly quite selkie).

[1] Except last week, I *had* arranged to go in the cam at the puntmoot, in lead up to taking up swimming again.

I thought it might be too cold, it hadn't been a very summery day, and flirting with raining. But the water was cool, which felt pretty good, and to make up for it, the showers were full and hot, which felt very very good. Though it would be nice to be sunny *sometimes*

I thought I mightn't be able to do it any more. In fact, I was AFAICT, pretty slow -- I can still swim, but not with a very efficient technique any more. But I can get up and down enough that it works rather than doesn't work.

I thought I might be embarrassed at stripping off in public -- my sveltness wars with my tact and my constantness as aspects that appeal people to me the least :) I think the same every time I get a new girlfriend, for that matter. But since Ghoti's party, I decided I might be able to improve it, but didn't see any point worrying about it. And indeed, no-one objected, and somehow when everyone's drenched its different.

It was quite quiet. There were at most half-a-dozen people, all circular swimming, so pretty much no-one's in anyone's way whatever happens. A couple of people in mini-wetsuits (which makes you look like you know what you're doing), a couple of middle-aged men who look like they could swim for leagues, a young couple who seemed to come to swim two lengths and shower together :) A young man in red shorts who practised diving with the lifeguards whenever the middle was clear. I met one of the men in the changing area coming out, and he said he came every day, and highly recommended it.

ETA: And I dropped my watch, but it overfulfulls its waterproof rating, and a nice man found it for me, and I can still manage to scoop stuff up from the bottom in a shallowish end.
jack: (Default)
Nov 21 Tue. Prestige with Dragonwoodshed. Was going to CTS but ended up having an evening in.
Nov 22 Wed. Fitzwilliam Museum.
Nov 23 Thu. Lunch with Sonic and Ninewells.

Also, I cycled back along the ring-road. There was a cycle path wider than a cycle, with nothing parked on it, and a wind not opposing me, and a mile long traffic snarl through lots of roundabouts, so I could cycle the entire thing in highest gear without stopping. That was wonderful -- I forget that in theory all cycling could be like that, instead of always being attacked by cars.

Nov 24 Fri. Afternoon DVDs with uisgabeatha. Evening drinking beer and having guy talk with Tim and Justin.
Nov 25 Sat. Tolkien Foreyule Feast!

Yay, this was very pretty. I was going to wear my santa costume -- I wish I'd had my cloak and shirt -- but felt it was too hot. Everything went without a hitch, the food was good, the people were nice. And afterwards Eni and I sat up chatting and drinking tea.

Nov 26 Sun. Met Liz for food at Yippee's, and then for food at Dojo's (whoops :)), and went to CUSFS games.

Munchkin was not approved :) We played a round of Zendo -- apparently my rules are too mathmo :) Then Star Base Jeff, which is simple and fun. And then I fenced MHF for ages, and watched the denouement of Vinci (as in, Vini Vidi, not as in Leonardo de) which was a rather good territory conquering game.

Nov 27 Mon. Casino Royal.
Nov 28 Tue. Tolkien Grammar and Pronunciation Pedantry Evening. Pippa came[1], squee. And we read funny and serious things.
Nov 29 Wed. A Date Why-are-all-the-nice-ones-taken with MCG.
Nov 30 Thu. CUSFS games evening -- lots and lots of Munchkin. These guys are hilarious :) I can't quite rid myself of the feeling that Star Munchkin[2]
Dec 1 Fri. S&M party. Thank you both, enjoy Coventry! It was fun, with lots of nice people, and alcohol, and chats. I wore my shirt, with mixed reactions :)
Dec 2 Sat. Aforementioned Banquet.
Dec 3 Sun. Lots of sleep, if I recall correctly.
Dec 4 Mon. Skipped Bridge and Pizza for a night in writing fic.
Dec 5 Tue. Ditto.
Dec 6 Wed. Yesterday. A productive day at work. (Don't worry, it's not the *only* one.)

OK, that's all. My life pinned butterfly-like to a board. I have lots of feelings too, but I might post them privately :)

[1] Oo-er.
[2] Dan: "It's Munchkin. In SPAAAACE"[3]. Me: Yes, that's what it says on the box. Trust me, SILLY.
[3] I also need "SPA+CE" in my dictionary :)
jack: (Default)
Thanks to Rosy for making a great cloak (pictures... somewhere). Squee. Hugs. It's sky-blue with a silver lining, and with a frilled shirt looks absolutely gorgeous. Why can't I enjoy normal clothes that much?

And is insanely good when ceilidhing, it adds expression to every movement, and swirls, and envelops people, and keeps you warm. Except I don't need to be kept warm in a ceilidh :)

The banquet was fun -- alternating interesting food with dancing, is about the best combination I can imagine. And I met some new nice people. The only problem was lots of people dashed out to the LARP before without eating properly, so were starving in anticipation by the time the starter was coming out.

LARP was fun. Orcs nearly -- but not quite -- overran the city. I need to practice being competent and safe with weapons, but it was fun, and I had a few great moments, hopping over to finish good guys off :)

[1]

Dec. 4th, 2006 12:32 am
jack: (Default)
[1] Hard science fiction in that the fiction explores a science idea, and that that idea is rooted in real-life science. Although not exactly immediately realizable -- but then you could say that about Verne too, it's only in retrospect it becomes clear. I think those three are a rough description of what makes hard science fiction?

As it happens, I like both hard science fiction and space opera. I'm not sure if that really makes sense. I guess I like the superficial "in space" aspect, and the typical awe of it all, and other aspects of each.

I haven't seen much hard science-fiction recently. I guess it's hard because recent science, especially physics is too complicated to break down easily for an average reader (though there's always interesting thoughts about biologicals, and people still hammering away at the idea of IT and cyberspace).

There are plenty of books that explore fictional physics (including fictional theology/magic) to a greater or lesser extent. The boundary is fuzzier than you might imagine -- think of Vinge, where the physics is (a) almost certainly little to do with ours (b) not especially much self-consistent but (c) not inconsistent with ours (d) thought out and (e) completely integral to the plot.

Thursday

Nov. 30th, 2006 03:34 pm
jack: (Default)
On thursday I cycled out to Ninewell, one of the small nature reserves round Cambridge. It's a tiny wood with a sluggish shallow stream leaking out of a number of chalk wells, supposedly feeding Hobson's Conduit.

It's very strange to cycle up to a layby and get out. Normally I'm either going somewhere, and cycle up to the door, or going for a walk in the country, and go in a car/train.

It's pretty. Walking around nature always gets the creative juices going -- I updated the beetles in my flash game (not online yet) making them face diagonally, which makes them feel considerably more aggressive whilst being about as easy to squish -- and enables a few more levels.

Just the other side of the wood is a national cycle route alongside the railway which I incporporated in my route back. Along the centre were coloured footlong stripes, stretching into the distance, which I wondered about, thinking it was a cycle route thing.

Do you know? See http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/transport/projects/cambridge/shelford_addenbrookes_cycle_path.htm -- it's a commemorative depiction of a section of genome, with four colours for G, C, T, and A.

When I was walking along I wondered if I could tell which direction the pattern went. Not really, and of course, it does have one, but I probably could never have told by examining it. But if you had two (or more) colours of stripes you could use but nothing else, could you indicate a prefered direction?

Using a rainbow pattern is cheating. You can't use a 1,2 pattern because that's symmetric. You could have w,b,ww,bb, but only if you know white comes first :) wbwwbbwwwbbb or rbbgggrbbggg work. But are you sure you'd *which* way it was telling you to go? Is there a better suggestion?
jack: (Default)
My time-since-woods and time-since-museum quotas had been running low. I'd hope to get out of cam for a bit, but ended up preferring to catch up on flash-game-writing, fiction-writing, and sleep.

Instead, I visited the Fitzwilliam Museum, which I never *had* got to in the last five years. The building itself is lovely -- like being in a modern stately home, all classic and intimidating, but tall and clean and airy too.

I also looked inside LSM as one of the churches that were open. I'm not Christian, but I do like to have seen churches, the sense of peace is great, and the vast stone things say "Here we are and here we stay" better than any modern buildings :)

Mum talked me back all across arbury to Sonic's and to work to pick up the latest cache of books, and to tesco's for quorn and supplies, and home.

I stopped to ravage pillage sonic for 80s cheese -- as in DVDs, not as in cheese, which would be pretty high by now. Which helped relax me the rest of the week :)
jack: (Default)
I found a half written post from last monday. I tend to try to collate these so if I have an interesting thought I can finish writing it up later, but this might as well be shared.

* Happy Starwars Day
* The problem with this meme is I end up thinking about it all day until it goes off. Setting an alarm to do it at a random time would make it worse, as I'd always be on tenterhooks. But I am spodding things I wouldn't otherwise so I'll probably keep doing it.
* Yay, M&S wedding next week!
*LARP: haven't fixed character, or kit, not sure whether to go, or go with a temporary character, or ceilidh.
* I like the smell of chlorine (as provided by drain cleaner), probably because it reminds me of going swimming with dad.
* Work: Two weeks after I pump out some code, flatten out the problems, and pat it into place in the whole project, I find a couple of bugs sprouting from it like mushrooms. I don't like what this metaphor is comparing my code to :)
jack: (Default)
I just realise I've been busying myself for two weeks, and haven't got round to updating. There were lots of things I was going to mention, that were put off until I had time to write something amusing about them, but that if I don't now, I never will.

I like to record everything briefly in case I need to look back and see when something was, so I'll try to write one funny sentence each.

Two weekends ago: Owen, Richard and a couple of others came round here for DVDs. We mainly watched Drop the Dead Donkey. This is very good, and got a round of applause at one point :) The episodes all had mentions of current events, and now start with a clipping "This episode was first aired in a week wehn..." but it's *less* out of date now that it was when I first saw it repeated on TV, because we're invading Iraq again, etc.

ETA: DDTDD, Sally is portrayed as a bimbo in her first episode. But isn't she the only character no-one could ever fancy? Still occasionally likable, but odd, isn't it?

On tuesday: Sonicdrift's birthday dinner (thanks!). It was nice, and we went to chez gerard, which I hadn't been to, but had very nice food, I'm glad I did.

Good friday: Went to ewx's impromptu party (thanks!). I've only been there a couple of times, but for some obscure reason it always seems to follow the same pattern: I have a headache all day, can't find paracetemol, go to ewx's, drink lots of water and some wine, dukebox some songs, and have insanely random conversations with nice people.

Easter weekend: Lots of buffy (reactions to be spodded later) and film watching, short walks, and big spring clean. There's some tidying I'd like to do, but the flat is comfier for it, so I'm glad, and the letting agents were ok.

Easter Sunday: Films at Mobbsy's (thanks!). THX-NNNN is strange. I was curious to see it, but it left very little impression on me. Does anyone wish to defend it? PERFECT BLUE was intense and curious anime psychological thriller. It did keep yyou guessing about what was going on. CHAM is an amusing name for a band though; wikipedia actually 'sic'ed it. BLACK BOOKS was another comedy series in a small bookshop, which I'd never heard of, but had some great moments.

Easter Monday: More buffy, more cuddles, more cleaning.

Also: Veizla organised, work going well, had 10 hours sleep last night :)

Games

Feb. 7th, 2006 12:22 am
jack: (Default)
Blockus

On tuesday I missed Tolkien because I'm too fond of the quiz and went to games evening. We played Blockus, which I thought was a very elegant game. One has board of about 30x30? squares, and each player has pieces, one of each shape of 1-, 2-,... 5-ominos (eg. the one [][][][][] piece would cover 5 consecutive squares of the board). You start placing a piece in your corner, and thereafter take it turns to place a piece one square of which diagonally-adjacent to a square of a piece you'd already placed AND NOT HAVING any square orthogonally adjacent to one. (Winner is the one with the fewest squares left when no-one can go.)

Excusing the slightly awkward ruling, there's just that one rule, but leads to fun consequences. Surround area so your opponents are denied it and you can fill it later. Squiggle diagonally between other players diag-touching pieces and fill other areas of the board.

Lord of the Fries, Villa Piletti, Hogwarts Cluedo

At sonicdrift's on sunday we played Lord of the Fries, a pretty silly, scoring-by-getting-rid-of-sets-of-cards games about Zombies in a fast food restaurant. Also Villa Piletti again, which is nice.

And hogwarts cluedo, which was quite a nice adaption of it. I never used to *really* like cluedo -- I felt if only I could write all the information down right it'd be obvious but tedious to work it out, but that was never practical, and never worked out the best way. Which meant it was never really *fun* to play because I was feeling I should. I've a better feel now, enough to not take it too seriously, though I will look up some strategy at some point. The touch of humanity was people spontaneously ganging up one player with the evil ghost.

It was a nice evening, though I'm not sure if people clashed a bit by feeling like different sorts of games at different times, leading to no-one being completely satisfied.

Penultima

At post-pizza we played penultima again, the game where each Spectator chooses a rule for how type of chess piece should move and the Players try to figure it out during the game. I think it *sometimes* works quite well socially because spectators can reasonably chat while people are thinking and don't have to take it *too* seriously. And I like the working it out, because if the rules are chosen right you have enough of a feel for what they do not to be completely blind, but aren't overwhelmed by strategy as if you knew them all and had to work out a winning combination.

When the rules I was playing against were revealed I was quite pleased how they all seemed to hit the sweet spot of not too obvious before hand, but possible to work with, and obvious in retrospect. And I liked the names. We even developed a bit of an endgame, which was interesting as I had made some lucky guesses and had a fair idea of how several pieces moved -- but had had most of them taken. And then we rushed to finish so we could go home and sleep.

Wake

Feb. 7th, 2006 12:07 am
jack: (Default)
For posterity, I shall record the (not-completely-traditional) order of my Afmaelisdagr. IIRC everyone but me joined hands, and circled three times widdershins. Then I handed an avatar of the earth (an apple) to a Reeve or Companion, and asked them to hold it aloft while I called on it in the name of maybe twenty aspects, relatives, or parts to aid. This was repeated for five planets.

Some of the names were mildly mangled, as even the kinder rot13 was tongue-twisting, but the kicker was the Aztec-god aspect of the sun.

Five assistants were intended to form the points of jomscarf-pentagram about me, but at the last minute I listen to the baying of the new sun and decided this particular one would appreciate strength of feeling more than ritual.

Then they circled again, I called the names of the five planets and the sun, everyone had a *small* sip of mead from the horn, a libation was poured on the ground, and the sun rose. Just about.

Several people joined us that morning, including [livejournal.com profile] davethedog, of whom we still have his mark-signature added to the list of Jomsvikings. Unfortunately I was made to promise not to name him as the next reeve.

For that day the day was beautiful -- crisp, cool, but warm in the sun, and all round a perfect morning. Unfortunately since, it seems to have been uniformly grey, to the extent that I wondered if we were under a nuclear fallout and I just hadn't seen the news.
jack: (Default)
Bridget Jones I saw all of the movie, and liked it a lot. I take back disparaging comments -- though I still think the book is laugh out loud funny like few other things and should be read. Before I only saw the second half, and didn't get a lot of the changes. A fistfight? Really?

A friend was asking if it wasn't non-feminist. I'm not sure any more. She is rather hopeless. But then I identify with her as me, as anyone, though some of her hopelessness is expressed in relationships in a different way to I do, perhaps due to gender[1]. And she is hopeless the way half the population is, but is reasonably successful. And she does do some pro-active things, if less so in the field of relationships. Though she certainly tries.

Timecop I was all prepared to yell at the time travel. IIRC it wasn't especially worse than many, though I was puzzled by some what determines who isn't changed by a timeline change issues as normal. In fact, I lost it in the first minute, before time travel was even mentioned. What was special about the gold? They carbon dated it and it came from 17xx.

Is it just me, or is that odd? Firstly, gold doesn't normally have much carbon in, especially organic carbon, does it? OK, suppose they measure the decay of an isotope of gold. Why would it change when the gold is, um, stamped into bullion? OK, suppose the radiation is slightly greater on the surface than in the mine, and they can measure that change. What isotope are they looking at? The second-most-stable has a half-life of six months. Doh. I give up.

It did teach me what metastable isotopes are. That was interesting.

Stargate Daniel Jackson/Claudia Black OTP Squee!

Deal or no deal For anyone else lucky enough not to follow TV, the idea is you have 20 shuffled boxes with amounts in from 1¢ to £0.25M. You choose a few, discard them, then accept an offer related to the average of the amounts remaining, or continue -- if there's one box left, you get what's in it. It is *really annoying*

[1] I know that should be sex. But at least gender is non-ambiguous, as one amusing conversation underlined.
jack: (Default)
A brief update. I left cambridge for worcester after a week of being increasingly busy as I think "I can make up for it later" on the thursday before χmas, and en route had a very nice coffee with Angel, being the first time I sat down for a week. I went to the pub with family both nights, then we went up to Grandfather's in Lancashire for christmas day, stayed until yesterday, and I'm going back to cambridge tomorrow or sunday.
jack: (Default)
Saturday was the big birthday party for [livejournal.com profile] lnr, [livejournal.com profile] mobbsy and [livejournal.com profile] damerell at the Cow, formerley the Red Cow iirc. It seemed to work out pretty well as a venue, there was enough room, and a dancefloor, and an open bar does simplify birthday alcohol!

I went on the dancefloor a couple of times, but still aren't accustomed to bopping. Probably because I only ever used to experience it when I went clubbing with people from school, which wasn't really ever that fun. I stole a few minutes of salsa and cha cha with amenable girls, but never really got into the swing of real music.

I met again several nice people I've seen around, and time flew past. I disappeared for the last half an hour of the round ceilidh, but didn't see anyone I knew there.

Happy brithday and thanks to the three of them!

I already blogged Sunday, didn't I?