jack: (Default)
Dear White People

A satirical film about several black students at an Ivy League university. The radio show host known for activism and her sarcastic "Dear white people" show. The pushed-to-succeed son of the Dean. The nerdy gay journalist who would rather be left out of things. Generally interesting and enjoyable, but even more pointed now than when it was made :(

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dear_White_People

Black Narcissus (1947)

Adapted from a Rumer Godden novel, apparently famous for some technological innovations: even now the colours and visuals of the abandoned stone palace, the steep valley, and the long views out from the Himalayas are striking.

Shortly before Indian independence, a group of nuns are invited by the local Indian ruler/general and colonial administrator to set up a convent including school and hospital in a remote Himalayas valley, and gradually fail because the locals don't really want them, they're completely isolated, the leader is sympathetic, driven and well-meaning, but doesn't have much experience solving problems when they all start to go off the rails from isolation, and generally colonialism is giant clusterfuck.

I'm not sure what to say about it, but it raised lots of interesting questions in me: how much did these characters actually want to be there, and how much was a convent their only life choice? How much of the descent into disaster was due to something environmental or supernatural, how much due to inexperience, and how much to being where they weren't really wanted? If sexual attraction had been less stigmatised, would they have avoided ending in a stew of jealousy, and murder? How much of Sister Ruth's problems are due to an unspecified mental illness, how much to being generally unlikeable, how much to being excluded and given no responsibility, how much to the situation?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Narcissus

A-Team Movie

This was a generally enjoyable action movie, I was very pleasantly surprised. I've not seen the series to compare it to, but it did a good job setting up the team as doing spectacular but incisive and necessary violence, and their conflict with more sinister bits of the government.

Many of the action scenes were intercut between what's happening, and planning sessions or post-mortem sessions, which I felt worked very well, it felt much more interactive that just watching an action scene straight through from beginning to end.

The action scenes managed what I think is valuable but hard to evaluate, that it felt like competent characters dealing with complicated messy situations well, rather than people just wading through redundant outclassed opponents.

And I finally actually remember who all the four characters are and which is which.
jack: (Default)
I have been trying to record at least a few thoughts about books or films I've consumed, but I've got too much of a backlog to think I'll actually do as much as I'd imagined, so here's a brief list.

Calgary

Set in Ireland, about a member of a small town who shoots a very nice priest in revenge against the church for allowing another priest to abuse him when he was a boy. Well done, I don't know if the portrayal of Ireland is good or horrible, the subject matter is very uncomfortable.

Firefight, Brandon Sanderson

The sequel to Sanderson's overly-specified novel about anti-superheroes. It continues the same strengths (worldbuilding, consistency of superpowers), and flaws (characters, emotional satisfaction). It fills in backstory from when powers were first discovered and some major heroes and villains were scientists who'd hoped to use them for good. It progresses the plot. Overall, it felt a bit flat, but gave me a lot of good ideas and I'll definitely read the third one.

planetary comics

A collected series of comics about an alternate history where an alternate-version of (roughly) Fantastic Four are villains who control most of the world, and the Planetary organisation which does... various stuff. It's beautiful, glorious, in showing "here's a cool thing, here's ANOTHER cool thing, here's a cool character, here's an even cooler character". Lots of it stuck with me. It doesn't try for much consistency in worldbuilding, which disappoints me, even though it might have been incompatible with what it does well.

Beauty and the Beast

Judith finally showed me another of the Disney films I'd never actually saw. It's really pretty good, both in a good story, and a good overall message: Gaston creeping on Belle is a great portrayal of a socially-powerful person imposing unwanted romantic attention on someone, enough that it's really obviously creepy, without descending into torture-porn.

The Beast is scary without being creepy in the same way, and it's clearly shown that he's doing a bad thing by kidnapping Belle even if it isn't completely her fault, and him saving her life redeems him, not her.

I'm also quite amazed at the Beast's animation, that he's beast-like enough to be menacing, but humanoid enough to be plausibly romantic with Belle.
jack: (Default)
Velveteen

Seanan McGuire's superheroine short stories, feely available online although the format is a little inconvenient. These are really fun, if you like that sort of thing at all they're well worth reading. Thanks to ghoti-on-lj for reminding me they exist and I should read them!

They're short and a bit tongue in cheek which suits SM's style well. Being a superhero has been branded, standardised, commodified and marketed by some firms, one of which now has an near-universal monopoly. The heroine, with her "animating stuffed animal powers" flees from her old employers, and doesn't find a quiet life.

There's a little bit of what I especially like, of exploring powers.

As with most of McGuire's stories, something about the consistency or worldbuilding just aggravated me, but much less so in these funny, human, and short stories.

Pendragon Protocol

These urban fantasy books reminds me a little of rivers of london, London-based procedurals about an organisation affiliated with the british state but not technically police or intelligence services, who are modelled after reincarnations (sort of) of the knights of the round table.

The main character is an established knight who gets in over his head when internal politics starts happening.

There's lots of "exploring the basic concept and how it turns out to be more complicated than people think", which is done well. It's a bit more complicated than "reincarnation of", it's a bond that can change, but that's enough to sell the idea.

Again, it's quite British based. Mentions of oxbridge colleges, non-white britons, class warfare, uneasy tensions between idealism and the establisment status-quo which are not handled perfectly, but better than many books.

Uprooted, Naomi Novik

Squeee! This is really good, I'm glad she tried writing something after Temeraire. Definitely read it.

Agneieszka, a young village girl, is unexpectedly chosen to serve the wizard called The Dragon who is lord of the valley, the greatest wizard in the country but retreated to this rural seat to take responsibility for holding back the ominous encroachings of the wood.

Lots of different sorts of magic, well world-built. Focus on Agneieszka rather than soldiers and experienced wizards, without idolising her. Realistic tensions between people with generally well-meaning goals but selfish or short-sighted or otherwise naturally imperfect. Peels back the world to slowly to reveal where the wood came from, etc, etc, in a way that most books save for the tenth sequel.

I like the way there's a distinction between an informal, intuitive sort of magic and a rigid formalised academic sort of magic, but unlike many books, it's not massively gender-essentialised.

Infidel

A film about a british muslim man who finds out he was adopted and born to a jewish family. It could have been excruciating, but Liv recommended that it was surprisingly touching. And captures a feel of british jewish society and british muslim society imperfectly but better than most films. It is embarrassing, but more towards the Evelyn Waugh/Monty Python end of the spectrum than the Adam Sandler/Reality TV end of the spectrum -- I found that a bit difficult, but it was clearly sympathetic to all the characters even when they were acting out badly. And it was really funny in places.

It fits my heretofore unmentioned heuristic "watch every film which features Leo Rosen's Joys of Yiddish" :)

(As usual I own most of the books but rented the film.)
jack: (Default)
Once Upon a Time, Series 1

Borrowed from ghoti and family. Thank you!

I saw the pilot ages ago and thought it could get a lot better or a lot worse, but when I mostly saw it, it got a lot better! The basic premise is that an evil queen's curse sends all the fairytale characters to a town in the real world without their memories. Each episode forwards the plot in the real world, while also filling in the backstory of one or more of the characters from before the curse.

The backstory parts are amazing. They take the basic story outlined in the first episode and add more and more history to the characters, that never undermines what was previously established, but for all of the characters adds a lot more detail that make them a real character. Especially the evil queen, and even more so, Rumpelstiltskin, played amazingly by Robert Carlyle, they become so rich, multilayered characters.

I don't even fault the magic! Despite mostly being "make it up as you go along" style of consistency, it's usually plenty clear what you need to know, and rules like "true love can break any curse" are explored like the three laws of robotics, not ignored, but returned to and expanded.

Unfortunately, I wasn't as sure of the real-world plot: I loved the characters and the setting, but it felt like the plot was treading water a bit to get everything else to catch up. Even when dramatic things happened, it felt like it had to keep propping up a status quo where Regina was mayor until the end of the season.

I know lots of friends loved it (with some caveats), I'm interested to see how season 2 goes at some point.

King and Joker

Has been on Liv's shelf for ages and ages, and I liked the sound of it, but it was now until I finally read it.

I enjoyed it a lot. It's an alternate history where the british royal family were more like the dutch royal family, reduced in prominence, and establishing the little domestic relationships of the central family and the people close to them, framed by practical jokes that become more serious and turn into a murder mystery.

I do echo Liv's caveat that although well done, it's aggravating that the spanish and scottish dialects are spelled phonetically :(

Necessary Beggar, by Susan Palwick

I have very fond memories of this as it's a book I picked off Liv's shelf when I was visiting her in Stockholm, when I wanted something interesting but not too mind-stretchy (I think the previous I read was Ted Chiang :)) It didn't have a big effect on me at the time, but it's grown on me a lot in retrospect.

A family are exiled to Earth from a great city in a parallel fantasy world, arriving in a refugee camp. It takes the metaphysics as read and concentrates on the characters and their relationships to each other, and in learning to settle into American life. It's easy to get into, but carries you away with a lot of love for the characters, the trade-offs in adapting to a new culture, and the background mystery of the original crime which is slowly resolved.

Apparently she has written some other things, which I didn't think to look for before: I have ordered her collection of short stories.
jack: (Default)
Book: Secret Water

One of the later Swallows and Amazons books by Arthur Ransome. I remember enjoying S&A and swallowdale a lot, and having mixed feelings about a lot of the middle ones, but liking this one. I loved the feeling of setting forth to explore in a realistic but constrained sandbox.

Alas, unsurprisingly, the Racism Fairy has left some deposits in it since I last read it. Much about cannibal tribes as seen by explorer-obsessed children of the time :(

Ender's Game

A fairly faithful adaptation of the book. I was surprised how much of the original they managed to keep. The space battles didn't feel appropriately tactical -- more like just a mass of spaceships thrown at each other -- but the bits in the command centre and battle school did feel right.

And how different it is when you're looking from outside and see Ender as a child, rather than looking out through his head and knowing why and how he does the things he does. The times ender physically attacks someone are lot more gruesome when you see a child doing it, I'm a lot more shocked by that now :( :( :(

Arietty

Studio Ghibli did a very good adaptation of The Borrowers! It didn't completely grab me, but it was often beautiful and usually true to the book in spirit even when the details were changed.

It was also a very strange thought to see it in a partly contemporary setting. That we're very close to the point where someone upgrade their mobile and drop the old one with a broken screen behind a filing cabinet where a borrower might be able to inch it into a mousehole... And maybe, maybe not, at the point there's a usb charger small enough they could splice it into the mains under the floor. But if so, that changes the story completely, it's no longer them isolated apart from families in the same house, they could sit under the floor and IM other borrowers on the other side of the world!

If they can find a way of finding each other without tipping humans off :)
jack: (Default)
Recent

"Gods behaving badly". Sitting on my to-buy pile for ages because I saw a good rec online. Greek gods in much reduced circumstances in the modern world. Felt more mainstream than fantasy. Fairly well done, but didn't add much over other similar books.

"Watership Down" Reading along with rmc's readthrough. I realised that when I said "I'd read it", everyone didn't automatically interpret that as "...every couple of years and love every chapter of it" (despite the flaws).

"Walking Dead #1" from humble bundle. Modern comic about classic zombie apocalypse. Good, but I need to decide if I can be bothered to read further.

"The Wicked and The Divine" about twelve gods who incarnate in the bodies of twelve people who die after two years, but live the high life in the meantime. I love the finger-clicking. Got the first volume and read the first two issues, definitely going further.

"Almighty Johnsons series #2", about Norse gods reborn in New Zealand. All the usual problems I'd expect from mainstream media, but less so than many, and funny and engaging. I only just realised how much of an innuendo the title is.

"West Wing" Finally saw series #3 thanks to ghoti.

"Misfits" UK TV show about young offenders in a community service program who get superpowers. I want to watch it in order so I bought the box set, but aren't really excited about each individual episode.

Upcoming

Hope to see "Big Hero 6" with Liv at the weekend if I have the dates right.

Legend of Korra season #2. I'm assured this gets more Korra-y and less love-triangle-y later on, so after not being sure after season #1 I bought the next one.

More "Sandman", the fifth absolute volume! Liv and I got this for Xmas and have been reading another chapter when we've had time, which has been not nearly enough. But we've been good about neither putting it off too much, not binging too much!

"Two serpents rise". I need to re-buy this!

"Foxglove summer" I said I'd wait for the paperback because I really really wanted to read it, but didn't need to read it right now and hate cluttering my shelves up with hardbacks. But now I'm regretting it, but the paperback is that much closer...
jack: (Default)
I had a rant prepared about "stop being so wet, I don't care if you're too shy to express them, but have an opinion about something!" and "your problem is not that you have new relationship energy with someone else, it's that you and your fiance have nothing in common".

But that's not true, is it? Shakespeare wrote awesome plays about "oh look, new relationship energy, lets make really unfortunate decisions" and "oh dear, I don't know what to do now, oh look, everyone's dead".

But more and more mainstream films just make me want to yell at the characters to pull themselves together, but that doesn't help because (a) me yelling at people is no more informative than other people yelling at me (b) everything already happened and (c) it's fictional.
jack: (Default)
Often a plot has a structure like:

1. A hero triumphs over adversity with the virtue of some aspect of humanity, in contrast to the villain. Eg. love, free will, hope, etc, etc.

2. The villain reveals that actually he's been manipulating the hero all along, and actually the human virtue was a comfortable illusion.

3. The hero says, "actually, by SHEER FORCE OF WILL", I will ACTUALLY triumph using the virtue you despise, and does so.

Obviously many stories only do 1, and many stories only do 1 and 2. And sometimes it's not actually a virtue, it's just the hero thinks she knows what's going on, or that so-and-so is her friend, etc, and then the villain reveals that was all a plot, and then the hero suddenly puts all the red herrings together and figures out what's REALLY going on, or the spy decides they really DO want to be on the hero's side after pretending to be for 300 pages, or whatever.

It's possible to do this story very well, and represent an epic clash of philosophies in an action or detective story. For instance, (imho) Total Recall or Anthony Price both have reveals that go "this is what's going on, no wait THIS is what's going on", but both make more sense, both more sense as a coherent narrative, and more sense as a one-up triumph of the story's philosophical position.

However, many stories, even quite good stories, fuck it up. I think the pervasive problem is that for this to work, 1 has to be plausible, 2 has to make MORE sense, and 3 has to make EVEN MORE sense, either coherently, or thematically. However, audiences are trained by bad stories to gloss over inconsistencies, so when you reveal that #1 is incorrect, they may go "whu? I was supposed to spot that? I was too busy glossing it over, I thought I was supposed to".

I think the fundamental problem with the Matrix sequels is not that they outright suck, but they attempt to subvert the first film's comparatively straightforward "kung-fu good, virtual reality indistinguishable from reality, being enslaved even unknowingly bad" message with a lot of rambling nonsense based directly on the first film's weakest points (namely, why are we in the matrix in the first place). Investigating unresolved questions is good if you can make them clearer, but bad if you just draw attention to something everyone was happily suspending disbelief about. The rambling nonsense is not inherently a BAD theme, it's just that the films are much, much better setting up the message of the first film than that of the later ones, so it comes across not as clever, but as stupid.

I think this is why, after the second film, we still held out hope, because it raised interesting questions, but hated the third film, because it just confirmed everything we thought was stupid.
jack: (Default)
I thought Casino Royal was great.

Daniel Craig was good. I'd seen him in Layer Cake, and he seemed similar. It's a step back to when Bond was new, and does everything in a twinkle in his eye, when killing or seducing. He still gets it all right, but it feels like he enjoys overcoming a difficult challenge. And the flirting feels like flirting, rather than "Ooh, another girl! Now I can use an atrocious pun again!"

It's a touch grim, with people dying, and Bond getting hurt.

The poker is actually portrayed well. Of course Bond wins, and you're kind of hit over the head with the explanations they want you to understand, but it's tense and realistic (afaik) and drawn out, which is really difficult for any card game in a film.

It's not a spoof like last time (which I did admittedly enjoy), but has its fair share of funny moments (often involving Judi Dench, squee). And it pretty much keeps to the laws of physics!

Of course, I don't know how it compares to older Bond films.
jack: (Default)
Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?

The first time I saw this, it seems boring, confusing and pointless. Now I had a lot more sympathy with it.

I liked Everret (Clooney/Ulysses) a lot, his language, and his intellectual give it a go ness. Did I not like this a few years ago? I really can't remember.

As with many films, knowing where it's going can actually help; something unexpected or dragged out can be aggravating when you don't know it, but fits when you know how to take it.

Has anyone seen it who knows the Odyssey? It is supposed to be a homage of some sort, but I only know a bit about the original. The same sorts of things (a succession of bizarre encounters and delays) seem to happen to somewhat different characters for very different reasons; lots of the scenes felt tacked on, despite constituting most of the film -- does someone who's read the Odyssey feel differently? Do you get a connection between Everret and Odyssius or not?

Get Real

Has anyone else heard of this? It was incredibly sweet!

It's the story of a gay boy at school, but just works. I love *him*, he takes life with a cheeky intellectual smile, even as school life is a right pain, and lets his problems blind him to his friends; which lends him an occasional assurance no-one as hopeless as him should be allowed :)

It's *funny*, always from nothing more than a turn of phrase or expression, but they always fit perfectly, and however awkward the situation is never painful to watch, unlike so many personal comedies.