jack: (Default)
Rules: http://liv.dreamwidth.org/459251.html

List of things in the order I like them, with one removed, and with three more added at the top, middle and bottom:

Maths
Twitter
Stuffed Dinosaurs
Nessie Ladle
Undercooked Aubergine

I'm sad the Nessie Ladle is so low down! It's totally awesome. But I decided Stuffed Dinosaurs were even better :)

I also took the liberty of mutating the rules, which wasn't explicitly asked for, but is implicitly in the rules by virtue of how humanity works :) And because I thought it might get ugly if I had to play "think of something worse than gender essentialism, think of something worse than that, ok, now worse than that..." Even if other people can make that an interesting conversation!

Advice Day

Dec. 4th, 2013 01:07 pm
jack: (Default)
via Liv and wild_irises

If you had to give me one piece of advice (however ridiculous), what would it be?
jack: (Default)
You are offered the chance to become an Instant Expert in any one field of academic endeavour. Which field of academic study do you choose, or do you turn the offer down entirely?

This is an interesting question, I'll answer in three parts.

Would I want the expertise?

Yes, definitely. It might make sense to pick a subject I know nothing about, so I gain proportionately more. But honestly, what I'd like is to know maths to a professional level, rather than a graduate level.

When I see a question about physics or biology or literature, I'm more likely to think "I wish I had someone to explain that to me", but when I see a question about maths, I'm more likely to think "I wish I knew that."

Would I want the job?

I'm not sure. I think it was a good thing I didn't do a PhD, I think the risk of me drifiting would have been too high. But I think I'd like being a professor. And I'd like to discover something genuinely new. But on balance, I'm not certain, but I think I'd rather make great software than great maths.

Would I want the prestige?

I don't know. In general, I'd like to be admired, but when it comes to it, I actually only want to be admired for things I've actually done, not for stuff that just fell onto me.

On the one hand, that sounds quite laudable. But on the other hand, I think it's a manifestation of imposter syndrome: to some extent popular successful people are those who say "I worked hard, so I deserved to capitalise on the luck I had" rather than "oh, well, I worked hard, but I only succeeded because I got lucky". Most likely, if someone's parents/peers were millionaires, they'd think being a millionaire was appropriate compensation for the work they do. And if they were destitute, they'd think being destitute was what they could expect.
jack: (Default)
A word meme about five words associated with my journal.

Programming

This is what I do every day. And am interested in. As do/are many of my friends. Hence, I talk about it. Although funnily enough, I don't talk about it as much as you might think. I think I'm often embarrassed to do so, because of the chance I'll seem ridiculously ignorant about something, when I'm supposedly earning my salary as a programmer, or ridiculously pretentious for caring about something other people don't bother with.

Magic: The Gathering

I think Magic is a great game for geeks. I got into it slowly because I knew it would be a time and money sink, but it fulfils many of the criteria that are really enjoyable: it's possible (if you don't make a deck too ridiculous) to play a quick game in half an hour or less; it passes the time in a social fashion; there's enough skill and randomness that the better player usually wins, but that it's rarely devoid of interest; it has microcosms of just about every aspect of game theory; many of the cards are just shiny; it's a rule system that geeks love exploring; there are many different formats, ranging from completely casual to fiendishly competitive.

Of course, there are problems with it: if you get into it seriously, you will spend money one way or another, because the cards are ultimately produced by a company; it often draws out people's obsessive geeky-competitive tendencies (I don't know if that's because it's antisocial, or because it's social enough it's the only place you met people who will tend to be obsessive); the rules are quite well written, but undeniably complicated to pick up at once.

The weird thing is, it's one of the very few things I like I'm embarrassed to admit to many of my friends (obviously excluding people who like it like I do). Most people I know are tolerant in the sense that they won't blame me for liking something, even if they do think it's puerile. But (I'm not sure if this is accurate) I still get a vibe that liking magic is somehow "sad". That although you can like many hobbies, pouring energy into magic is a disproportionate obsession the way liking TV or roleplaying isn't. And I think I subconsciously know what people mean, but I can't put words to why that should be so.

Fantasy

I'm going to assume this is about fiction and not about unfulfilled dreams :)

At some point when I was a teenager I started liking science fiction and fantasy. I can't remember a clear transition. Partly that's because scifi/fantasy is what a lot of children's books quite naturally are.

I remember finding Asimov's "Caves of Steel" sophisticated and intellectual when I was about 10.

I can't ever remember noticing a clear distinction between science fiction and fantasy until I made friends with the sort of people who argued about that sort of thing at university. I mean, I would have known there was a difference, but I would instinctively be drawn to either.

In principle, I would have thought what would draw me to the genres was the interest in hypothetical questions. I'm sure I did like much classic SF on that ground, and still enjoy (rare) engineering-heavy SF. But in fact, a lot of what drew me in was the sort of stories told, which are often more evident in fantasy than SF.
jack: (Default)
Because it's Monday afternoon:

Ask me three things you are curious about, and I'll give you one true answer, one complete lie and one misleading answer.
jack: (Default)
Things mostly under control, though still much faff to do in the evenings.
CTS, gah, should have advertised beerfest instead, couldn't becky have said *before*?
Thinking about over summer, acting etc.
jack: (Default)
The weekend went well overall (spod to come). Lists of things which need to be done this month are less overwhelming me, but ones that don't *need* to be done are being postponed several times, and at some point I need to work out if at the current rate of doing and finding new things to do I'm catching up on them or not.

I really need to go to the bathroom and debug my program before I forget where I got to, so I'll leave this comment here.
jack: (Default)
Temporarally cut for broken html )

You know what I'm doing from so many of my other posts, so I'll just say: I am happy.

(Despite work not being quite as productive as it should be this week and today, but I'm only about half an hour behind, and should be leaving by 6.30)

Code: <div style="border: 2px solid darkgreen; padding: 3px;"><p style="text-align: center"><b>Monday and Friday meme</b></p><p>Most people tend to blog when they feel a certain way, which gives a distorted impression of them. To add extra representativeness, choose two times a week and copy this meme, every time, posting how you feel right then, however briefly.</p><p>I choose Monday and Friday 2.00pm (except bank holidays)</p></div>
jack: (Default)
How many times has someone on your friends list posted about something and you were really confused, but you didn't want to ask because you knew you SHOULD know? How many times have you felt 'guilty' asking a close LJ friend a question that should be 'obvious'?

Stupid guilt. It's maybe inevitable, but I think encouraging asking "By the way, what did you mean about...?" is good. It's the best way of finding out interesting things about me, especially things I wouldn't *write* a post about :) But there are *other* reasons for not asking, such as not wanting to be impolite, or to intrude, or not getting round to it.

If you've missed a few things, missed an entry and are confused, ask me any thing. Even something EXTREMELY basic, like where I live! I'm not allowed to get even slightly irritated at any of the questions - we've all missed things before. In turn, you may repost this in your own journal. ;)
jack: (Default)
Reccommend to me one story you've written that you're proud of, any genre, however old or new, here on my LJ.

Then - if you like - go forth and ask the same in yours.

If you can't decide, choose two. Not being good is not an excuse not to do it :)

(Gakked from foreverdirt.)
jack: (Default)
http://www.okcupid.com/tests/take?testid=6466991387133790712

The first time I got 90%, because I didn't expect an answer to *actually* be 'none of the above' and for the last question I stopped after eliminating the first two wrong from left to right, without stopping to see that they were all even.

Apparently 2% of people got it all right -- interesting because I only did because I saw Naath's correction of one question, so I knew what I was supposed to put. Or maybe that's the idea -- they want to date people who correct the quiz.

I think "nothing" is a perfectly acceptable answer to "What is the decimal value of the binary 0000?" though I couldn't be bothered to check if it was also valid.

Ultimate binary quiz! Yay! With no mention of: negatives, one's complement, fractions, bitwise operators. I'm not sure, I *may* have written assembly language in my sleep. If you go to bed thinking about something you've been doing...

Cursing

Dec. 20th, 2005 01:38 pm
jack: (Default)
Wow, I use the word 'dick' a lot. (here, if you want to see the meme) This surprised me: afaik I don't use the word 'dick' at all.

It's not something I tend to swear with. I generally use something inventive, or 'fuck'.

It's not something I call people -- to me someone being a 'dick' has a subtle distinction from similar insults, suggesting someone who is obnoxious, and not deliberately maelevolent, but specifically accepts their behaviour and makes no effort to change it.

It's not something I call a penis except in occasional jest. I've annoyed or endeared a couple of people by being basically unable to call a penis anything but a spade penis.

And then I remembered - I had a long post about translating spotted dick into spanish. That was probably it.

It reminded me of Gene Wiengarten testing his spam filter. He found several emails about female dogs, gut men porn at monmouth, and the like vanishing, and then when he was thinking the threshold was too high, got a "see a teen girl do it with her horse its[1] free", and commented "They still have some kinks to work out of the system. As it were."

This sort of thing keyword filtering isn't going to catch, and indeed would be quite difficult to filter for even with fairly decent language processing, though normally gives itself away by having html, pictures, non-existant words, links, or 1En copies.

[1] sic.
jack: (Default)
1. Fill out this quiz.
2. If you want, post this on your lj.
3. If/when at least four of your LJ friends have taken the quiz, see here

It asks you to choose which friend gave each answer, so you may wish to not give completely unhelpful answers, though it does mean the quiz does give you a chance.

I apparently know Angel pretty well, Owen and Mair less well, and Fluffle not at all. Which might be right :) I'm somewhat handicapped by Owen and Angel being in the same city, and Flurble and Fluffle being in Australia together, and really not knowing Fluffle at all. I tried the quiz again a couple of times to see, and did worse and worse every time, with the proportions about the same.

Tarot meme

Dec. 17th, 2005 01:36 am
jack: (Default)
I'm the tarot hermit. I suspect a lot of people might be -- all my answers were veering between literature and science. I am intrigued by the tarot, though predictably don't have any belief in the supernatural. But it was going to be instrumental in a short story, and I like the heritage, and the idea of different decks representing the same thing in different ways, and perhaps even the idea of a reading just as introspection.

Piers Anthony has several books obsessed with it, another aspect of him that I find quite pleasing, slightly worrying, and overwhelmed by others.

There was a choice of five decks: cat, chinese, dragon, fantastic and winged. I expected the dragon to be coolest and the cat people to be kinky, but of all the pictures I liked this old man the best.
Read more... )
jack: (Default)
But suppose there was another me. What would it be like? It's a staple of comedy (and tragedy) fiction, though often not explored as fully as it could be.

* I was reading some of my lj archive and old fiction yesterday. It was instructive: I laughed at reading things, I enjoyed my writing (bar the occasional big cringe). We would probably enjoy writing and beta'ing for each other.

* Would we like each other? We'd probably have some great conversations. OTOH, we'd probably really annoy each other, and see each other as smarmy little gits who get all the dates. And perhaps keep trying to occupy the same niche in friendship groups. Or maybe separate, and have different friends, because there's too many people I like and I don't have time to be friends with them all. I probably wouldn't fancy him, but might cause some people to squee *enormously* if we kissed.

* We could work very well together, understanding just what we meant. A few of me could probably form a really successful company, especially if one or two can be persuade to concentrate on other specialities like management and finance. We'd always know what the other was doing, and not argue and aims and strategy and coding style. It'd be cool.

Meme: Well, if you want, copy this and think about your clone.

Vicariously

Dec. 9th, 2005 02:38 pm
jack: (Default)
Dating StrengthsDating Weaknesses
1. Flirtiness - 87.5%
2. Sense of Humor - 85.7%
3. Financial Situation - 76.9%
4. Confidence - 61.1%
5. Adventurousness - 58.3%
1. Appearance - 77.8%
2. Temper - 62.5%
3. Arrogance - 50%


Read more... )
jack: (Default)

Oh Great Cthulhu!

I have been an extremely busy devotee this year.

In March, I bombed a cultist gathering (-100 points). In May, I stopped [info]yrieithydd from defiling Lovecraft's grave (-20 points). Yesterday, I fed [info]numberland to a Shoggoth (250 points). In June, I defiled the grave of that traitor, Lovecraft (90 points). In October, I rescued [info]lizzip from being sacrificed (-200 points). In July, I sacrificed [info]toft_froggy to Cthulhu (500 points).

In short, I have been very good (520 points) and deserve to be promoted to High Priest.


Your humble and obedient servant,
cartesiandaemon


Submit your own plea to Cthulhu!
There's a certain confusion of ideas here. I mean, bombing cultists could be viewed as bad, but in some sense it's emulating Cthulhu, isn't it?

Ditto about [livejournal.com profile] yrieithydd. I didn't have her down as a graverobber.

I'm not sure if in Cthulhiverse there's that much difference between being a high priest and being eaten. But I'm happy with it. *sacrifices people*

Active Recent Entries