(no subject)
Jul. 24th, 2007 09:23 pmMy debit card has become cracked, and I phoned HSBC for a replacement. I was amazed -- I was sure they'd manage to introduce administrative faff somehow or other, probably by cancelling the old one immediately, but no, they took care of it immediately.
Though I suppose they won't be putting "I called with an extremely simple request and you said you weren't going to fuck it up" on their testimonials pages.
Though I suppose they won't be putting "I called with an extremely simple request and you said you weren't going to fuck it up" on their testimonials pages.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 07:07 am (UTC)Why must the admins at LJ be such incompetent clowns?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 08:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 09:14 am (UTC)Why must the admins at LJ be such incompetent clowns?
*Are* they? I don't know much about livejournal's organisation (if I had the time, I'd rather used a distributed lj rather than bully lj into being what I wanted) but I would have assumed it was more a case of "this got too big and it's not engineered to the hilt" rather than "bwuh! me dumb! deelete!" But I don't know.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 10:04 am (UTC)Uh, what did your comment say?
I was asking what you meant by hacked. Do you mean it was cloned, or that someone got hold of the numbers and used them online, or something else?
"this got too big and it's not engineered to the hilt" rather than "bwuh! me dumb! deelete!"
There was a power cut in the financial district where LJs servers are hosted. The backup power at the data center failed to work and so LJ dropped off the net. This isn't their fault.
What is their fault is the loss of data that happened afterwards. No data should have been lost. I made my comment at least 30 minutes before the power cut which suggests either they do something very very stupid and don't commit things to disk very often (I can't actually imagine how they could do that over such a large period of time), or (far more likely) that their databases server(s) got corrupted so they had to restore a backup.
LJ seem to have a bad history when it comes to these things. During the last major outage it took them several days to get back online and in that time they discovered that the disks in the RAID arrays were not fsyncing properly so they had a lot of corrupted data. I would expect them to have fixed these problems since then and to run regular tests. This is basic stuff.
Brad Fitz said at the last USENIX conference that he thinks hot failover between multiple sites is a waste of money. I wonder if that reflects his general thoughts on engineering for reliability.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 11:03 am (UTC)(He could conceivably have meant "cracked" in the sense of electronic crime, but surely in that case he would have wanted the old card cancelled immediately?)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 11:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 11:25 am (UTC)But most times I phone up I think it *ought* to be easy, but often it turns out to be minorly kafkaesque for either legitimate reasons I hadn't thought of in advance, or stupid or exploitative ones :)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 11:54 am (UTC)There were 41 emails, representing two to three fewer crack events (since some were only quoting previous usages -- eg. notification emails for this).
Excluding commercial messages, I found the senses of broken, cocaine (metaphor for addictive), whip, craic (Irish word for fun or a night out), crypto, a loud noise, to go crazy, "have a crack at", "crack team", "butt crack", and "crack out the ..." all once. Cocaine (crazy stupid) twice. And to laugh hysterically four times.
In commercial messages (generally from arts picture house) there were: cocaine (literally), "crack out" and go crazy once; crack team and broken twice; and crypto thrice.
It was never used where "hack" could be :) (Though the crypto sense is obviously related.) I obviously hang out in the wrong circles :)
It's actually really interesting: I wouldn't have realised that there were so many, nor which were most common. It's like verb tenses -- you get taught present tense as a child, but then you never ever use it again, even though you think you do.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 11:58 am (UTC)I guess I was imagining "administrator" as a technical person; possibly not a senior person able to authorise money for big changes. And being optimistically charitable -- I know if you plonked me down in the situation, depending what resources I had, I might not be able to do everything right, and that might be incompetence or might be ignorance.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 12:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 02:27 pm (UTC)(ack! everyone is pointing out that I'm wrong! stop it! ;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 03:11 pm (UTC)But Rob, it was a perfectly reasonable reading, don't worry. If you know what the alternatives are, you could tell which, but of course you get stuck with the meaning you expected.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 11:49 am (UTC)Of course I do -- I don't like feeling wrong or stupid, so I don't suppose anyone else does either. I would have said everyone else does the same, I'm just worse at it so its more obvious and patronising :)
OK, that's not quite fair -- sometimes it is, but I always try to be both positive and fair. But even assuming you have the right to evaluate what someone else said is a bit patronising.
I'm glad it is appreciated :)